Johnny Cochran?
or
Jackie Chiles? 
Posted on 11/23/2023 8:17:44 AM PST by patriot torch
Michael Voris has been investigating the rampant theft and homosexuality going on all over the nation, but particularly in the New York diocese. He has done some investigative pieces on out of control priest and homosexual prostitution being paid for out of Church donations. We call the homosexual heretics in the Catholic Church the “lavender mafia.”
The Lavender Mafia decided it had enough of Michael Voris and his meddling in their affairs. They begin to dig into his background and were going to (maybe they still will) quietly leak his past sins to the progressive mainstream media to discredit him and force him to stop uncovering the truth such as 50% of Catholic priests and Bishops in the US are practicing homosexuals and the Catholic Church has an AIDS epidemic going on throughout the priesthood. Michael Voris has especially focused on New York and has found that Cardinal Edwin O’Brien in New York appears to be “close” to a growing number of active homosexuals, including Father Peter Miqueli that stole hundreds of thousands of dollars from two parishes to pay for Keith Crist his gay prostitute. The gay prostitute that he took with him to Rome several times and that spent time with Cardinal Edwin O’Brien. All of this Cardinal Dolan knows. Either Cardinal Edwin O’Brien is a practicing homosexual or has been completely compromised because of past sins. Cardinal Timothy Dolan has done nothing as long as these priest “keep it quiet.”
Michael Voris has said in the past that he lived a “very sinful” life. He has put it out there multiple times that he was “ashamed” of his past life. And in truth, that is all we really need to know. The rest is between his God and his priest. Yet Michael Voris was forced to let us know more to preemptive the attack of the Catholic homosexual lobby by outing himself as a past homosexual. He lays it pretty much all out there. I think it took a lot of bravery just to put it out there. However since the lavender mafia were going to try and destroy his reputation, he decided to put out his story himself.
The author goes on to state:
"Michael Voris and Church Militant TV had taken stances that I do not agree with. And they have attacked people who don’t agree with their positions; such as not criticizing the Pope directly and their constant attack on the SSPX community. However in this situation, I have great sympathy for Michael and what he has been forced to admit publicly. I will not fall for the lavender mafia tactic of trying to destroy a man’s reputation if he doesn’t “pay up” by shutting up. I pray and hope Michael Voris makes it through this attack by homosexuals. I hope that his honorable stance motivates others to stand up to the Catholic homosexual lobby."
The huge numbers of homosexuals within the Catholic clergy and hierarchy has destroyed the moral credibilty of the Church. How can it be a countercultural beacon of decency if it itself has been permeated with neo pagan,hedonistic decadence? America which now tolerates widespread abortion, homosexuality and all its permutation, celebrity and earth worship, pornography and overt hedonism badly needs such a moral beacon.
I went to a Jesuit college and knew of at least two active homosexuals while there.
Its disgusting hypocrisy. They can live any lifestyle they want in public, yet choose the ONE profession that requires them to control their sexual urges, preaches against their behavior, and asks them to act as model to others.
It is most definitely satanic.
Interesting how the “Lavender Mafia” was developed from within the hierarchy, to silence those from within who dare to expose the apostate practice embedded so deep within the roman catholic church.
It seems that is what this guy sought to do, and in response they essentially put out a hit on him.
The “Code of Silence” continues, even as it leaves a wide path of destruction to he lives of innocent children.
...and yet these abusers are the very ones who are upheld by that doctrine, to have the power to forgive sins.
Matthew 15:13-15
King James Version
13 But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.
14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.
15 Then answered Peter and said unto him, Declare unto us this parable.
Pray for him.
“his relapse”?
What about the systemic abuse within the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic church he sought to expose?
He has been destroyed by the Lavender Mafia, not because he had a relapse, but because he refused the orders to keep his mouth shut.
From what I understand, his guilt is limited to being a homosexual. But the guilt he sought to expose within the roman catholic church continues.
and I quote:
“The Lavender Mafia decided it had enough of Michael Voris and his meddling in their affairs. They begin to dig into his background and were going to (maybe they still will) quietly leak his past sins to the progressive mainstream media to discredit him and force him to stop uncovering the truth such as 50% of Catholic priests and Bishops in the US are practicing homosexuals and the Catholic Church has an AIDS epidemic going on throughout the priesthood.”
And they get that power, not from their own righteousness or virtue, but from Christ Our Lord, who is the true minister of every sacrament.
Even Caiaphas, while plotting to murder Jesus, correctly prophesied to Israel by virtue of his office. (John 11:49-52) Do you not understand the implications of that? When Romans 11:29 says "The gifts and calling of God are without repentence," it means it.
You're trying to claim that there's some sort of conspiracy going on, but the real explanation is simpler by far. CM isn't controlled by the hierarchy, but if they were, and the hierarchy wanted them silenced, that would have happened long ago.
There are certain Roman catholic church members who deem it worthy to highlight whatever they find in internet searches, that target INDIVIDUAL members who are Protestant.
Alleging sexual abuse scandals within Protestant churches equal that of the systemic child sexual abuses within the roman catholic church.
The sheer hypocrisy is appalling!
The majority of these articles themselves make my case. When it’s Protestant, generally speaking it’s limited to individuals who ARE held accountable.
Contrast that with the WIDESPREAD abuses and cover ups within the roman catholic church which are allowed to continue for years, decades and centuries.
And when someone like Voris seeks to expose them, the Lavender Mafia is called upon to destroy their lives like a pack of wild dogs.
The objective them becomes, hey, look what we found out about Voris, rather than, hey look at what the investigations of Voris has discovered.
“And they get that power, not from their own righteousness or virtue, but from Christ Our Lord, who is the true minister of every sacrament.”
__________________________
That sounds like a popular tradition that would be readily received, by a wayward flock, who are indoctrinated to entrust heretical tradition over the very Word of God.
But let’s see what the chosen Apostle unto the Gentiles would have us to understand as he relates to us the Inspired Word of God:
Galatians 1:8-10
King James Version
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.
The entire Word of God is made of none effect to those who are taught not only that mere men have the power to forgive sins against God, but homosexual men.
Doesn’t it seem strange when God Himself warned us of such apostates?
Truth is, when non Scriptural offices are created such as cardinal and pope, it’s easy to blur their “callings” as if it were by God.
That is inexcusable rationalization and justification for hand waving away the condition of Roman Catholicism.
The very Scripture that Catholics claim their organization wrote tells exactly how to deal with sin in the church and they are not doing it.
It gives qualifications for church leadership, which they ignore.
Catholics accuse Protestants of taking sin too lightly and condemn the theology of the security of the believer as a license to sin, and finger point and yet don't seem to notice the hypocrisy of excusing away the abominable gross sin and rampant immorality in their own ranks.
Catholics condemn homosexual clergy in Protestant denominations and excuse it in their own, just like we see here. And the homosexual sin in the Roman religion goes back over a thousand years. Peter Damian had a lot to say about it in his day.
*Official* doctrine means NOTHING when it's not adhered to. It's just virtue signaling.
And the Catholic hierarchy response is going even beyond just ignoring it to outright trying to silence those who seek to correct it.
Newsflash, the gates of hell prevailed against Roman Catholicism LONG ago.
Bishop Accountability
Abuse Tracker
Daily guide to media coverage of clergy abuse worldwide, and especially in the US Roman Catholic church. More than 100,000 articles blogged since 2006.
https://www.bishop-accountability.org/
add to that...
Free Clergy Abuse Case Review
If you or a loved one suffered the physical and emotional effects of sexual abuse committed by a clergy member or priest, you may be entitled to legal representation and financial compensation.
*Cases may be filed anonymously to protect the victim’s identity.
Receive your response in 24 hours
https://www.abuselawsuit.com/clergy-abuse-consultation/
The Roman Catholic Church is a major offender in the nationwide scandal of child sex abuse. Abusive priests misused their authority to sexually abuse children. High-ranking church officials often covered up these horrific incidents. In some cases, these cover-ups perpetuated the cycle of abuse in other parishes and dioceses.
https://www.abuselawsuit.com/church-sex-abuse/
List of Abusive Priests and Clergy Members
https://www.abuselawsuit.com/clergy-abuse-consultation/
Thanks for sharing the links.
No problem. Happy to oblige.
Hopefully it will fall into the hands of those who were victimized by the widespread cover up and abuse within the roman catholic church, who’s acknowledged head sits in the vatican rather than in Heaven.
A mere assertion, based upon presumption.
1. No apostles were Catholic, such as evidenced in Acts thru Revelation (which best shows how they understood the gospels) they looked to the street-level leader Peter as the first of a line of popes possessing exhorted ensured perpetual magisterial veracity, nor commanded, reminded, exhorted the churches to submit to Peter as such, nor as making provision for a successor to any apostle, save Judas, which was to ensure the original 12, and was chosen by casting lots.
2. Which NT church never taught that or exampled that Peter was the "rock" of Mt. 16:18 upon which the church is built, interpreting Mt. 16:18, rather than upon the rock of the faith confessed by Peter, thus Christ Himself. Which is one of the most abundantly confirmed doctrines in the Bible (petra: Rm. 9:33; 1Cor. 10:4; 1Pet. 2:8; cf. Lk. 6:48; 1Cor. 3:11; lithos: Mat. 21:42; Mk.12:10-11; Lk. 20:17-18; Act. 4:11; Rm. 9:33; Eph. 2:20; cf. Dt. 32:4, Is. 28:16) including by Peter himself. (1Pt. 2:4-8
3. Nor prayed to anyone else in Heaven but the Lord, neither did any other believer in the over 200 prayers in Scripture.
4. Nor taught or exampled a clerical class distinctively titled sacerdotal "hiereus" (versus presbyterous or episkopos) whose their primary unique active function was that of confecting the true body and blood of the Lord out of wheat bread and wine, as an offering for sin and as spiritual food.
5. Never differentiated between bishops and elders, and with grand titles ("Most Reverend Eminence," “Very Reverend,”
6. Nor taught or exampled baptism without repentant personal faith, that being the stated requirement for baptism. (Acts 2:38; 8:36-38)
7. Never exhorted or commanded believers to regularly come to clergy to confess and be forgiven of sins in general, as uniquely have the power to bind and or loose, or manifested them doing so.
8. Never taught or exampled that there was a separate class of believers called “saints,” who directly go to Heaven at death, while the rest go to purgatory.
9. Never exalted Mary to a place of prominence as exalted intercessor.
Even Caiaphas, while plotting to murder Jesus, correctly prophesied to Israel by virtue of his office. (John 11:49-52) Do you not understand the implications of that? When Romans 11:29 says "The gifts and calling of God are without repentence," it means it.
Yes, you do not understand the implications of a impious man of high priest office which is simply not which is seen in the NT church, impromptu speaking a prophecy - not defining doctrine - without intending to, or understanding what he was doing, and without any form indicative that he intended this to be a prophecy, or that it was, and what would only be known (apart from Scripture) as a prophetic fulfillment after its fulfillment;
versus conditional (scope and content) ensured magisterial infallibility of office, in which a doctrine is so when the pope intentionally defines a matter, on faith or morals for the whole church, which may occur once in a 100 years or so, but is not subject to needed fulfillment for assurance that it is God, but which is based upon it form. And which no single apostle did, nor did Peter do so in council (and which he never called).
Do you not understand the implications of recourse to such a desperate erroneous egregious extrapolation? An unplanned unintended spontaneous utterance by the high priest, turns out to be a prophecy, by one who did not plan to speak it or understand what it all was, somehow translates Peter and successors possessing ensured perpetual infallibility when in the exercise of papal office one defines a doctrine of faith or morals to be held by the whole Church, and that the teaching is definitive is sppsd to be discernible by form. Meaning it is a matter of manifest doctrine, intended as being so, and which is to be held as infallible due to its content and scope, and form, versus being subject to needed fulfillment.
Meanwhile street-level leader among brethren Peter was not a successor to the high priest, certainly nor acting as one.
What the Spirit of Christ teaches is that true prophets were "Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow," (1 Peter 1:11) and accordingly
The the implications of such desperate recourse is that Catholic impugn the Spirit of Christ for not providing what they can only wish Scripture actually taught.
Legends in their own minds.
Very good. Thank you for that Scriptural detailed response.
Proving once again why catholics are taught to distance their beliefs from Scripture, all because their doctrine is man made according to “tradition” and nothing more.
Johnny Cochran?
or
Jackie Chiles?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.