[Jonty30]

That’s why I point out that Muhammad approved of the Bible of his day and the only Bible that existed in his day was the Nicaean Bible, which is the same Bible that exists today. All Bibles we use is based on the Nicaean Bible.

I also go on to explain that every Bible that is a scholar’s Bible, not a paraphrase or easy reader, goes through the same process starting with the original scrolls as far back as we can take them. Then, when the scholars are done creating their Bible, they put the Bible into the scholarly community for critiques and criticisms. Then the scholars rewrite their work to account for the criticisms and the process is continued until there are no more criticisms left.

Then they put the Bible on the market.

[RoosterRedux]

One of the reasons I have long believed that the Quran was Satanically influenced is because Mohammad (actually his successors) would have had to have had an incredible understanding of the Bible to write something so theologically oppositional to it.

Given their goal of showing the Bible to be a corruption of what is presented in the Quran, I would have to say of the writers of the Quran, "Job well-done."

Of course, I believe they are wrong and the Quran is a hodge-podge, but Islamic scholars have used it to great effect.

[Elsie]

...until there are no more criticisms left.

oh?

I doubt that this has EVER happened!