Replies

Absolutely correct Brian..I was just making the point that having a serious debate on doctrine is one thing ...name calling and highly inflammatory language is something else..

BTW what do you think about that Austin guy that is all over the tube now complaining of abuse when he was 20 -26 years old...This has become one big lets get rich plan..Thisa guy was 20 for Petes sake!!

Yeah, 20 years old. Unfortunately, what it looks like here is two very screwed up individuals managing to come together for a big tragedy. I've thought long and hard about some of these "victims" who were older or who repeatedly went back to visit their molester for more sex. That doesn't make a whole lot of sense. There are, of course, very unblanced and emotionally zombified individuals who crave any attention at all. That's a possible explanation. I find it extraordinary in the extreme that any adult male who is 20 years old and raised as a Catholic could claim that they did not know that having sex with a man was against church teaching and extremely immoral. This guy seems to be claiming that he was not legally sane at 20. The story really stretches the imagination but weirder things have happened, I guess. Suffice it to say, this guy must have been one screwed up 20-year-old. No normal, sane guy with all of his faculties in working order would let any man molest them without a good fight.