Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Technogeeb
I always love this sort of nonsense because it only indicates that the writer doesn't understand Scripture at all. While Gen. Chapter 1 describes the physical actions involved in creation, Gen. 2 describes the how man is different from animals and how he has dominion over them - it's two different perspectives on the same event and has nothing at all to do with a second week of Creation...which by the way occurred in 6 days...
7 posted on 09/29/2003 10:15:09 PM PDT by ahadams2 (One of those scary Biblical inerrantists all the liberals fear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ahadams2
I agree with your position, and would reinforce it with Matthew 19:4,5. In verse 4, Jesus quotes Genesis 1:27 and in verse 5, He quotes Genesis 2:24. Chapters 1 and 2 quoted in one sentence! Jesus did not take them to be contradictory, but complementary.
8 posted on 09/29/2003 10:34:50 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ahadams2
While Gen. Chapter 1 describes the physical actions involved in creation, Gen. 2 describes the how man is different from animals and how he has dominion over them - it's two different perspectives on the same event

The beginning of Genesis 2 is clear that 7th day has passed. Yours is the common view (that the later events in Genesis 2 are there to show that the creation of man was a "special" creation, a fact not in dispute), but there is nothing intrinsically linking the events in Genesis 2 to the 6th day (and if the beginning of Genesis 2 is to be believed, there is evidence to dispute it).

10 posted on 09/30/2003 9:50:25 AM PDT by Technogeeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson