Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Candidate Says "The Constitution is just a piece of paper."
YouTube ^ | March 26, 2010

Posted on 04/13/2010 12:39:49 PM PDT by mukraker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: mukraker
It is just a piece of paper with words on it

The American dollar is just a piece of paper with words on it. The Full Faith and Credit of the federal government is acceptable because the government has the power to tax citizens whatever amount necessary to satisfy America's obligation.

The government derives the power to back that piece of paper with words on it from another piece of paper with words on it called the Constitution.

and I ask them, “what makes America great?”

I would wager Roger Roth has not a clue what made America great.

What made America great and set it apart from other lands?

Was it natural resources, no other lands are equally blessed. Was it the people, no, the people who built America came from elsewhere. Was it government planning and wisdom that spurred our nation to great heights, no again?

It wasn’t what government did that made America great, it was what government was preventing from doing that made the difference.

What set America apart from other lands was freedom for the individual, freedom to work, to produce, to succeed, and especially to keep the fruits of one’s labors. American became great precisely because America prevented the stifling effect of too much government.

I can only hope the citizens in the Wisconsin district that Roger Roth is seeking office realize he is not Congressman material and not worthy of a vote. The outcome of any office he runs for will tell as much about Wisconsin voters as it does about Roger Roth.

61 posted on 04/13/2010 1:24:15 PM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mukraker

Here I thought you were gonna name GW as the politician saying that.


62 posted on 04/13/2010 1:29:44 PM PDT by runninglips (Don't support the Republican party, work to "fundamentally change" it...conservative would be nice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mukraker

Doesn’t anyone study American or US History?

The Constitution is set in stone which is why the Founding Fathers compared it to the Ten Commandments.

One MaJoR problem is that too many people think the Ten Commandments are just ‘suggestions’ or are ‘too negative.’

Someone needs to go talk privately to this man if he thinks he’s a Republican. He’s a Progressive, but he’s no Republican.


63 posted on 04/13/2010 1:37:09 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (SPEAK UP REPUBLICANS, WE CAN'T HEAR YOU YET! IMPEACH OBAMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mukraker

This is all the reason why you vote for conservatives and not party first types. Obviously this clown is extremely ignorant. It is candidates like this that is part of the problem with the Republican party. This something I would expect from a Democrat.


64 posted on 04/13/2010 1:43:08 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; knittnmom

Wisconsinite ping?


65 posted on 04/13/2010 1:45:37 PM PDT by Ellendra (Can't starve us out, and you can't make us run. . . -Hank Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mukraker
Roger Roth is exactly right. And everyone here would probably agree with him if they just put their emotions aside and instead listen to the point he's trying to make: which is that the constitution needs people that believe in it and what it stands for. By itself, it really is just a piece of paper.

He's warning us that a piece of paper isn't going to save us without people in government that believe in its principles.

66 posted on 04/13/2010 1:56:51 PM PDT by GeorgeSaden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mukraker

Sadly, this is so edited, that context could change what he has to say entirely.

It would do us more service to have full statements, so we can get what he’s saying in full context.


67 posted on 04/13/2010 2:11:31 PM PDT by The Watcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeSaden

The Constitution serves two purposes:
1) it sets up the structure of the government (legislative, judiciary, executive branches) with enumerated powers
2) it draws some bright lines that protect the citizen from the government (e.g., Congress shall make no law ...)

What the politicians don’t appear to understand is that the bright lines that protect us from them ... also protect them from us.

If they stay within the lines, we are obligated to follow their laws. If they step over a bright line (e.g., they decide to confiscate our arms), we have the right to abolish the government (e.g., refreshing the tree of liberty with the blood of patriots and tyrants).


68 posted on 04/13/2010 2:13:30 PM PDT by Mack the knife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

DITTO Puppage, DITTO!


69 posted on 04/13/2010 2:24:18 PM PDT by Budge (Who will protect us from the protectors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mukraker
There are principles that the Founders established in the Constitution that were intended to be inflexible and enduring. Primarily it was a document that limited government power and maximized individual freedom. Pure genius and revolutionary, it spawned the greatest nation on the planet.

The left's concept of a flexible, malleable, bendable, shapeable, living, breathing, defacating Constitution is another way of promoting the notion that in reality we have no Constitution, that we are to be subject to the whim of corrupt, greedy, venal contemporary politicians.

70 posted on 04/13/2010 2:37:54 PM PDT by steelyourfaith (Warmists as "traffic light" apocalyptics: "Greens too yellow to admit they're really Reds."-Monckton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated

Yea I’ve read history. Perhaps you should reacquaint yourself with the amendment process. There are several that have amended the original.

It’s a damn difficult process, so as not to be for light and transient causes, but it has been done 27 times.

But you’re right; God didn’t put an amendment process in His rules for man. But, after a couple thousand years or so of trial and error, man came up with a system, and ten very simple laws for government to live by. But being the imperfect beings they knew humans, even themselves to be, they did put in an amendment process.

Personally speaking: I think we need a 28th. Term limits for Congress! If it’s good enough for the president, then it ought to be good enough for those @$$holes.


71 posted on 04/13/2010 3:03:24 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: mukraker

Is this POS Steve Kagen’s district?


72 posted on 04/13/2010 3:10:13 PM PDT by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
I think we need a 28th. Term limits for Congress! If it’s good enough for the president, then it ought to be good enough for those @$$holes.

I've been preaching that for years, but a lot of folks think I'm wrong. But the "career" politician is our biggest problem; the public servants have morphed into our masters.

73 posted on 04/13/2010 3:20:53 PM PDT by JimRed (To water the Tree of Liberty is to excise a cancer before it kills us. TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin; Ellendra
Wisconsinite ping?, per post 65, your list?

It's animal skin, but no matter.

74 posted on 04/13/2010 3:24:11 PM PDT by SJackson (Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel and it must remain undivided, Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No, silly! Just the ones they don’t like, that’s all social construct, and there is no objective standard, everything is relative, and it doesn’t matter anyway. If you want to shoot yourself, or cut your pecker off, we’ll show you how.

Oh, but our tenure and pensions, and .gov retirement are sacrosanct and inviolate. Hm.


75 posted on 04/13/2010 3:28:26 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

And that is precisely why we need a 28th. But Congress itself would never propose such an amendment. It will take 2/3 of the states to bring it. And of course 3/4 to ratify it. It will be an ugly fight.

But we might just be in the middle of that “perfect storm”, and alignment of planets, for it to happen.

We just need to start talking about it more openly, with friends, family, prefect strangers.....


76 posted on 04/13/2010 3:36:28 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

Bravo, well said.


77 posted on 04/13/2010 5:14:19 PM PDT by John-Irish ("Shame of him who thinks of it''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mack the knife
They don't believe Americans would dare. You see, they believe that the collar fits, and we are accustomed to both the chafe and the limitation.

I vividly remember being five years old in 1776, standing at Concord Bridge and reading the inscription on the Minuteman statue there. I asked my father why they called it "the shot heard 'round the world?" Surely they didn't hear it in China.

My father gave me one of his serious looks (as a former Royal Horse Guards office, he had that down pat) and said simply, "Because they dared."

That bright line, as you note, is still there. I don't believe our people wear the collar as easily as the tyrants think.
78 posted on 04/13/2010 5:44:16 PM PDT by Robert Teesdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: lysie
Good grief... Can we not get people who understand what the Constitution is all about before shooting off their mouths?

Is he going to say the same thing about The Declaration of Independence?!

Alot of patriots died for this piece of paper as well.

Lord protect us from these people who choose to be ignorant of the past.

79 posted on 04/14/2010 3:16:04 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Where Liberty dwells, there is my Country. - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

You missed my point. With only the Democrats or Republicans to vote for, nothing will change. The Tea party must field candidates, and doing it under the Republican banner alone will not induce independents to join. Without an alternative party, the status quo will continue. Look at the Scott brown election - a Republican - everyone in the Tea Party cheered. And what is Brown’s first vote? He supported the Dems cloture vote. Sorry, I’m not a troll - been here for many years with lots of posts and 6 years of Republican municipal service - the TP needs to field candidates that capture the heart of the political spectrum, and merely supporting D or R candidates based upon their philosophies won’t cut it.


80 posted on 04/14/2010 6:45:12 AM PDT by majormaturity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson