you are delusional... you link regulation to militia and are ok with that, because the government cannot regulate arms... but by linking the militia to regulation, you allow them to do just that... grow a pair and stop demeaning my arguments by name calling and inferring my immaturity, when it is you, ignoramus, who misses the entire point. the militia is the populace, dipstick, and by accepting that point, that the militia can be regulated, you damn us all.
moron.
Thanks for signing your reply.
Maybe if you could get your head out of that warm dark place where you keep it, could you quote me from any of my responses where I say regulation of anything is okay?
As a grammatical fact, in the wording of either version of the amendment, (presently the point of discussion in this thread) the object (that’s a grammatical term with a real meaning) of the word “regulated” is the militia. I know careful reading is tough for you but try anyway, it’s been a continual source of amusement for me, bless your little heart