Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freebilly
That's better than assuming that when the tree was a sapling, the rock was only a pebble.
9 posted on 10/25/2003 10:55:44 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Doctor Stochastic
That's better than assuming that when the tree was a sapling, the rock was only a pebble.

Maybe it is a part of the tree that went inanimate. Reverse evolution.

It could happen.

If we start looking today, I am quite positive we will find transitional’s that are partly alive and partly un-alive. Evolution doesn't always seek out complexity like we have been predicting, just the survivability of rocks. I am making a scientific prediction that baring catastrophe this newly found inanimate tree will outlast a Bristle Cone Pine.

As smience journal, a pear-reviewed fruitful magazine, stated, "This would be different than petrified wood. We are currently convinced that this is a new form of evolution, the leap from life to non-life without the normal "dieing" process.

This is strong evidence that supports our worldwide scientifically excepted theory.

24 posted on 10/25/2003 11:37:57 PM PDT by bondserv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Doctor Stochastic
That's better than assuming that when the
 tree was a sapling, the rock was only a pebble.


ROFL   Thanks for making my day.
91 posted on 10/26/2003 4:24:34 PM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson