Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Signs Most Far-Reaching Abortion Restriction In Three Decades (Bias Alert)
AP ^ | November 5, 2003

Posted on 11/05/2003 6:02:32 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat

WASHINGTON -- President Bush signed into law the most far-reaching abortion restrictions in three decades Wednesday, an emotionally charged measure already challenged in three federal courts.

A federal judge in Nebraska called the law "highly suspect" and issued a temporary order blocking it from applying to four abortion-rights doctors who filed suit.

After years of frustration, legal setbacks and two presidential vetoes, hundreds of anti-abortion leaders rose in applause when Bush promised to vigorously defend the constitutionality of the law, known by its supporters as a "partial birth abortion" ban.

"For years a terrible form of violence has been directed against children who are inches from birth while the law looked the other way," Bush told religious leaders, members of Congress and other abortion foes at a signing ceremony at the Ronald Reagan Building. "Today at last the American people and our government have confronted the violence and come to the defense of the innocent child."

Abortion-rights groups said the law was overly broad, lacked any exemption for the health of a woman seeking an abortion and could outlaw several safe and common procedures. They also contended it was the first step in a larger campaign to ban all abortions for the first time since the Supreme Court's 1973 landmark decision legalizing the procedure.

"This bill marks a concerted effort to set back decades of progress in achieving reproductive freedom," said Gloria Feldt, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, which filed suit against the measure in San Francisco.

The bill gave Bush a major victory to show religious conservatives on the eve of a re-election year. But it also revived debate on a polarizing issue that could undercut his hopes of winning support from swing voters.

The bill outlaws a procedure generally performed in the second or third trimester in which a fetus is partially delivered before being killed, usually by having its skull punctured. Former President Clinton twice vetoed similar bills.

While anti-abortion forces cheered their victory, arguments against the law were raised in courtrooms in Lincoln, Neb.; San Francisco and New York.

In Lincoln, U.S. District Judge Richard Kopf issued a temporary restraining order, citing concerns that the law lacked any health exception. "It seems to me the law is highly suspect, if not a per se violation of the Constitution," Kopf said. He said his order would apply only to the four doctors who filed the lawsuit, but the ruling could extend beyond Nebraska because they are licensed in Alabama, Georgia, Iowa, New York, South Carolina and Virginia.

In Manhattan, U.S. District Judge Richard Casey appeared skeptical about arguments by Talcott Camp, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, which sought an order blocking enforcement. Casey did not issue an immediate order.

"Doesn't the court have to give some deference to the findings of Congress that are spelled out in this statute?" Casey asked, noting the findings resulted from eight years of hearings. "They say there is no threat."

About 30 states have enacted versions of partial birth abortion bans but in many cases they have been overturned in court. The most important ruling was in 2000 when the Supreme Court, on a 5-4 vote, said a Nebraska law was unconstitutional because it did not have an exception for the health of the mother and was too vague.

The signing ceremony included a patriotic background of American flags on the stage behind Bush. Several dozen abortion-rights protesters demonstrated outside.

"The best case against partial birth abortion is a simple description of what happens and to whom it happens," the president said. "It involves the partial delivery of a live boy or girl and a sudden, violent end of that life."

In a remark that brought loud applause, Bush said the right to life "cannot be granted or denied by government because it does not come from government. It comes from the creator of life."

There was sharp criticism from Democratic presidential candidates.

Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts called the law "a step backwards for women." Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, a physician, said it would "chill the practice of medicine and endanger the health of countless women." Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut called it a triumph for "the political agenda of right-wing Republicans." Retired Gen. Wesley Clark said it threatened a return "to the dark days before Roe v. Wade."

"Today we saw the real George Bush. If we could afford to, we would put that speech on television every day from now until the election," said Kate Michelman, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America. "Any shred of doubt that this is the most anti-choice president this country has ever had has been convincingly erased."

Bush said last week that Americans are not ready for a complete ban on abortion.

Sponsors of the new law say partial birth abortion is used roughly 2,200 times a year, principally during the 20th through 26th weeks of pregnancy.

Partial birth is not a medically accepted term, but as defined by the bill it is the delivery of a fetus "until, in the case of a headfirst presentation, the entire fetal head is outside the body of the mother, or, in the case of the breech presentation, any part of the fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body of the mother for the purpose of performing an overt act that the person knows will kill the partially delivered living fetus." (AP)


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; bush43; infanticide; mediabias; partialbirthabort; pbaban2003
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
...revived debate on a polarizing issue that could undercut his hopes of winning support from swing voters.

Funny, no mention from this reporter about the polls showing what Americans of all stripes think about this abortion procedure.

1 posted on 11/05/2003 6:02:33 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, a physician, said it would "chill the practice of medicine and endanger the health of countless women."

Strange how a procedure that is usually described as "extremely rare" by its supporters, suddenly now affects "countless women".

The pro-death crowd really needs to get its story straight.

2 posted on 11/05/2003 6:08:13 PM PST by dagnabbit (Whale - the ultimate free-range food)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
A federal judge in Nebraska called the law "highly suspect" and issued a temporary order blocking it from applying to four abortion-rights doctors who filed suit.

What the heck is this?

3 posted on 11/05/2003 6:08:42 PM PST by ladyinred (Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit
Chill the practice of medicine? Highly dramatic aren't we Dean?
4 posted on 11/05/2003 6:10:08 PM PST by ladyinred (Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
This commentary is so far out they couldn't find anyone at AP to put their name in a byline. Maybe it's a press release from NARAL or Barbara Boxer.
5 posted on 11/05/2003 6:18:31 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
What the heck is this?

Judicial tyranny. Wanna help fight it?

6 posted on 11/05/2003 6:20:16 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Good question. What the heck are "abortion-rights doctors" ?
7 posted on 11/05/2003 6:20:48 PM PST by dagnabbit (Whale - the ultimate free-range food)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
"Today we saw the real George Bush. If we could afford to, we would put that speech on television every day from now until the election," said Kate Michelman, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America. "Any shred of doubt that this is the most anti-choice president this country has ever had has been convincingly erased." Yeah, I'll even give them money if that's their plan. It just shows how out of touch the dims are. They go to their cocktail parties and think they have the country.
8 posted on 11/05/2003 6:21:20 PM PST by sharkhawk (I want to go to St. Somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit
What the heck are "abortion-rights doctors" ?

Ghouls who kill babies for profit.

9 posted on 11/05/2003 6:21:59 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit
Does anyone have a listing of the 400 supporters who were present. I would like to know just how many of the Roman Catholic hierarchy were present.
10 posted on 11/05/2003 6:23:20 PM PST by Rushian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
"President Bush signed into law the most far-reaching abortion restrictions in three decades Wednesday, an emotionally charged measure already challenged in three federal courts."

Far reaching because . . . . should we maybe mention that abortion has gone to a far reaching extreme. Birthing the body of a live fetus and stabbing into its skull is infanticide. As a woman, I am offended that these people think this is a "right" of women. They are ghouls.
11 posted on 11/05/2003 6:28:19 PM PST by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Recovering_Democrat
President Bush signed into law the most far-reaching abortion restrictions in three decades...

No...the President signed a law restricting infanticide.

Thank you, sir. ~~~ And, may God bless you, President Bush.

13 posted on 11/05/2003 6:30:33 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
The President's Speech before Signing the Partial Birth Abortion Ban along with his signing the Ban, can be viewed at Bush-Cheney '04 by clicking on the link below:

Click to Watch the President's Speech and see him Sign the Partial Birth Abortion Ban


14 posted on 11/05/2003 6:34:58 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Don't forget to Visit/donate at http://www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
When I hear someone making a point that PBA is a right, I graphically describe the procedure. So far, without exception, the people are shocked, not knowing what it really is. Not only that, I'v made a few converts that way. We should shout loud and clear what PBA is. Until people are sick or sickend of hearing it. The Media wing of the DNC (CBS,NBC,CNN, NPR) will never do it.
15 posted on 11/05/2003 6:36:34 PM PST by RantEng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Those who make 100,000 per month sucking fetuses out of the womb...
16 posted on 11/05/2003 6:41:55 PM PST by international american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Oh, you can expect that the liberal lemmings will reiterate every tired phrase at their disposal when it comes to abortion.

A short list of Orwellian political terminology will do: "Chilling effect," a "chill wind," "rare procedure," "right-wing," "right-wing extremists," etc, etc.

17 posted on 11/05/2003 7:00:29 PM PST by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk
"Today we saw the real George Bush. If we could afford to, we would put that speech on television every day from now until the election,"

I love it... I hope that we do!! Especially the part where he said that the right to life wasn't given by government, but the creator of life..... Gave me chills... This speech was very well articulated for a man that has been accused of being dimwitted and limited in thought and vocabulary.

18 posted on 11/05/2003 7:01:00 PM PST by Joe Anybody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

I have some liberal friends that are all for this judge; I have been sending them all to this link !(-=WARNING_VERY_GRAPHIC=-)!. No, I'm not kidding.
19 posted on 11/05/2003 7:28:32 PM PST by Michael Barnes (Al Gore's Invention is killing the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: unix

20 posted on 11/05/2003 7:31:46 PM PST by Michael Barnes (Al Gore's Invention is killing the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson