Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/05/2004 8:15:23 AM PST by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ZGuy
Barton is great. He's probably the number one irritation for American history revisionists who want to remove God from government.
2 posted on 02/05/2004 8:19:38 AM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
This needs to be sent to Je$$e Jack$on, Al $harpton, and the rest of the unelected 'Leaders of the Black Community' that badmouth Republicans.
3 posted on 02/05/2004 8:25:08 AM PST by jtminton (2Timothy 4:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
b-
4 posted on 02/05/2004 8:27:55 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
Wow, great essay! Bookmarked!
5 posted on 02/05/2004 8:27:55 AM PST by Paradox (Cogito ergo Doom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
Following is excerpted from a book I bought lately:

Table 3. Race Requirement for Suffrage, 1790-18551
State Year of
Statehood2
Year of
Requirement
Race
Alabama 1819 1819 White
Arkansas 1836 1836 White
California 1850 1849 White
Connecticut 1788 1715
1818
No Requirement
White
Delaware 1787 1737
1792
No Requirement
White
Florida 1845 1838 White
Georgia 1788 1789 No Requirement3
Illinois 1818 1818 White
Indiana 1816 1816 White
Iowa 1846 1846 White
Kentucky 1792 1792
1799
No Requirement
White
Louisiana 1812 1812 White
Maine 1820 1819 No Requirement
Maryland 1788 1776
1801
No Requirement
White
Massachusetts 1788 1780
1821
No Requirement
No Requirement
Michigan 1837 1835 White
Mississippi 1817 1817 White
Missouri 1821 1820 White
New Hampshire 1788 1792 No Requirement
New Jersey 1787 1776
1807
No Requirement
White
New York 1788 1777
1821
No Requirement
White, or "Man of Color, meeting property/tax requirements.
North Carolina 1789 1776
1835
No Requirement
White
Ohio 1803 1802 White
Pennsylvania 1787 1790
1838
No Requirement
White
Rhode Island 1790 1762
1842
No Requirement
No Requirement
South Carolina 1788 1790 White
Tennessee 1796 1796
1834
No Requirement
White4
Texas 1845 1845 "Africans, and descendants of Africans" excluded
Vermont 1791 1786 No Requirement
Virginia 1788 1762 White
Wisconsin 1848 1848 White

1Source = The Right to Vote; The contested History of Democracy in the United States, by Alexander Keyssar, Basic Books, New York, 2000. The above is an abbreviated version of a Table which also lists citizenship and "Native American" requirements. Cases where a state changed their original requirement are indicated, with date, in the Table; there were also many cases where a state reiterated their original requirement, at a later date, by statute or constitutional change, but these are omitted for brevity.
2Or date admitted to Union for original 13.
3Georgia's 1777 constitution explicitly limited the franchise to whites, but their constitutions of 1789 and 1798 did not. All secondary sources agree that blacks could not vote, but a very extensive search has not turned up a clear legal basis for that exclusion.
4White, "provided that no person shall be disqualified from voting in any election on account of color, who is now, by the laws of this State, a competent witness in a court of justice against a white man".


6 posted on 02/05/2004 8:28:57 AM PST by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
Bookmarked..
7 posted on 02/05/2004 8:29:03 AM PST by TomServo ("Why does the most evil man in the world live in a Stuckeys?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
There is no black voting rights. We must vote democRAT or we're traitors.
9 posted on 02/05/2004 8:31:58 AM PST by South40 (My vote helped defeat cruz bustamante; did yours?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
You can't let facts and history get in the way of "The Agenda" It's too important.


/S -off
11 posted on 02/05/2004 8:40:21 AM PST by Only1choice____Freedom (The word system implies they have done something the same way at least twice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
Some great reference material, here. I look back at LBJ's embrace of the 1964 Civil Rights Act...and realize what a fraud he and the Democrats pulled on the American people. It was only a few years early, that he, as Senate Majority Leader, gutted most of Ike's Civil Rights Acts of '57 and '60. For all the talk of helping po' black folk, it was LBJ who not only supported a poll tax to keep blacks from voting, he was also against federal lynching laws. At least he (and the NAACP) had the courage to recognize that it was Republican, Everett Dirkson, who deserved the credit for tirelessly working to get the 1964 CRA passed.

What most people don't realize...but was even acknowledged by Congressional Quarterly, was that Eisenhower was responsible for the greatest advances in Civil Rights in the past 80 years. As has even been noted here, most of what was in the 1964 Act, was what Ike and Herbert Brownell (Ike's AG) proposed in their original drafts of the '57 and '60 Civil Rights Acts, but were watered down by Democrats such as LBJ. These facts need to get out.
12 posted on 02/05/2004 8:43:59 AM PST by cwb (Dean = Dr. Jeckyll exposing his Hyde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
Excellent post: i.e. Its language was taken from the wording of Eisenhower’s original civil rights bill (before it was gutted by Democrats) and from proposals made by Eisenhower’s civil rights commission. [136]

Republicans have consistently used the motto of Ronald Reagan; "It's remarkable what you can get done if you don't care who takes the credit". A Republican president, Eisenhower, was the first Chief Executive since the Civil War to send federal, active duty troops (not Nat.Grd.), into the South to enforce the Constitution. The Democrats have never forgiven Republicans and, at the same time, have taken all the credit for the advancement of civil rights.

13 posted on 02/05/2004 8:48:41 AM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy

Bump!


22 posted on 02/20/2005 5:34:15 PM PST by Perseverando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
So, I'm bumping this 6 1/2 year old thread to see if anyone can fill in the missing parts for me.

This essay doesn't say what happened between the mid 1960s, when Republicans passed the civil and voting rights acts over the objections of the Democrats, and now.

What happened that shifted the black vote away from the Republican party? Did the black community leave the Republicans, or did the Republicans leave the black community?

23 posted on 07/15/2010 10:19:10 PM PDT by Washi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy

Good read.


27 posted on 07/16/2010 5:48:14 AM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead; ForGod'sSake

History ping


28 posted on 07/16/2010 7:53:25 AM PDT by EdReform (Stop Obamacare - Join the Obamacare Class Action Suit: www.obamacareclassaction.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EdReform; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
View past Libertarian pings here
29 posted on 07/16/2010 8:06:21 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson