1 posted on
03/01/2004 3:54:21 PM PST by
yonif
To: yonif
Bush knew!
2 posted on
03/01/2004 4:05:49 PM PST by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: yonif
I think that these researchers are just promoting controversy. The K-T (Cretaceous-Triassic) boundary is marked by a thin layer of Iridium, an element that is very rare on Earth and probably came from a meteor. Also, at the K-T boundary throughout the US are little "shocked-quartz" crystals that increase in size the closer they get to the Yucatan crater.
Still, I'm intrigued by the fact that the Deccan Traps, an enormous lava flow halfway around the Earth that went on for centuries, started about the same time as the asteriod hit and may have been caused by or contributed to the asteroid damage.
3 posted on
03/01/2004 4:20:06 PM PST by
DJtex
To: yonif
New research casts doubt on the theory that a single asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs. Scientists have often pointed to a crater in Mexico as the asteroid's impact point.
But Princeton University researchers say the impact that caused the crater occurred 300-thousand years before the dinosaurs were wiped out 65 (m) million years ago.
I think these guys are a little behind the curve. I've seen several pieces, I think endorsed by the original theorists, the Alvarez father son team, that talk about the Chicxulub event as one of many in an impact storm. This thinking has been tied to the controversial "Nemesis" theory, but whatever the cause there seems to be a periodicity of multiple impact events tied to mass extinctions.
4 posted on
03/01/2004 4:37:35 PM PST by
Phsstpok
(often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: yonif; farmfriend
At least one scientist doubts the group's findings. Yet another pi$$in' contest...
There's grant money in them thar craters!
FGS
6 posted on
03/01/2004 6:51:00 PM PST by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: yonif; tet68; ForGod'sSake; Phsstpok; billorites
Princeton has been a hotbed of anti-impactor GIGO. Some may remember the book by Charles Officer and Jake Page (see below) that claimed on the dust jacket that the sudden extinction by a large impact was "impossible". Dewey McLean used to run a website on which he claimed that the elder Alvarez basically ran him out of his own profession through threats.
And, let's not forget Aristotle, the Father of Nothing Doin', who stated
ex cathedra that stones do not fall out of the sky. Even in 1994, with comet SL-9 about to crash piece by piece into Jupiter, the cover of
Astronomy featured the title of an article inside that claimed there would be nothing to see from those impacts.
I was one of the lucky ones. I picked up this title off the remainder rack, cheaply, at the enormous chain bookstore.
Basically, I hold such claims in contempt. Such folks are stuck claiming that it was just an amazing coincidence that a large impact happened right at that time, or, even worse, that all the impact did was set off worldwide volcanic eruptions, and those led, over 100s of 1000s of years, to the extinctions.
7 posted on
03/01/2004 7:30:01 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Boom! Boom! Out go the lights!)
To: yonif
300,000 years... vs. 86,000,000
3.5 tenths of one percent
0.00348 - Quite frankly, I don't think that dating of something that old is quite that accurate.
Nose picking and admiration of the bugger.
8 posted on
03/01/2004 8:18:01 PM PST by
Swordmaker
(This tagline shut down for renovations and repairs. Re-open June of 2001.)
To: yonif
...and I doubt that scientist! What about methane gas which he and the oceans emit; ice ages and all that good stuff?
11 posted on
03/03/2004 8:15:46 PM PST by
Henchman
(I Hench, therefore I am!)
12 posted on
01/01/2007 9:05:16 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Ahmedumbass and the mullahcracy is doomed. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson