[Coeur de Lion]

I know of no Bush judicial nominees which he failed to be support in committee vote and that includes the judges painted as too Catholic or failed to meet the "pro-choice litmus test" by the dems.

It won't necessarily require two election to get a filibuster proof Senate; but we're not going to get one any sooner if one doesn't realize that rinos will vote in a fashion maintaining party unity. Do you think the conservative or moderate dems (few though they might be) favor fillibustering Bush's judicials nominees. I don't think so. Will they support a fillibuster? Yes! and that's because they know politics ain't bean-bag.

[Badray]

" It won't necessarily require two election to get a filibuster proof Senate..."

I'm confused. When I say that we will gain seats this year, I'm told that we won't. When I say that it will take 2 elections to get to 60, you tell me that it won't.

Which is it?