Posted on 11/20/2004 9:00:55 AM PST by UpHereEh
OTTAWA, - Canada's largest union of media workers is making links between the entry of Fox News to the Canadian market and the danger of foreign ownership of Canadian media.
In a statement released today, the Media Vice President of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, called on the Martin government to clarify its position.
"Prime Minister Paul Martin must assure anxious Canadians that their telecommunications, cable and broadcast industries will not be sold to foreigners," said Peter Murdoch of the 150,000 member CEP.
"The entry of Fox News, the ferociously right wing U.S. television news channel, into the Canadian broadcast marketplace, makes it incumbent upon government to maintain and reward Canadian ownership of our primary cultural messengers," Mr. Murdoch added.
"It is critical government assure Canadians that their voice will not be lost in the din of table-thumping rants of polarizing news outlets. The current budget process is an ideal time for Mr. Martin to not only announce that there will be no sell-off of Canadian cultural messengers, but that the talented Canadians who work in the audio-visual sector will find increasing support for their work.
"We need to bolster our own cultural forces to ensure that we are not over-run by the bulldozer of loud-talking American network bullies. It's that direct and that simple," Mr. Murdoch said.
His comments came on the heels of an announcement today by the CRTC that Fox News will permitted on Canadian cable outlets in the near future.
There are more of us than you may think ... and we fit right in.
No one here in Canada carries Al-Jazeera.
Thank you for your input ... I couldn't agree more.
Get the facts before you post.
Canadian culture? ROTFLMAO! Isn't that an oxymoron like jumbo shrimp? They must mean their far left liberal political culture.
My very first thought was "What are they afraid of?"
But we know.
I stand by my statement that no one here carries it. Oh, there may be a few that recieve it illegally, but it's certainly not wide spread like some would want you to believe.
I used to listen to RCI, till they screwed up the broadcast schedules with the quarterly change at the end of October.
Any way, before the last election, in May, iirc, they had some chick on saying the CBC, "That you are listening to right now", may get cut back if Stephen Harper is elected..."
So, Stephen Harper, or I should say his party, wasn't the majority winner, and the CBC is still complaining?
And I'm the one that lost my 6PM Radio Canada broadcast?
The fact is that yes Al-Jazeera has been approved (under content conditions) to be distributed in Canada however, no company IS or wants to carry it because of the fines they could face if something inappropriate slips through the sensors onto the airwaves. It's sort of like whats happening in the US with the FCC. Networks are unaware of what is or is not offensive until it airs and the letters pour in, and by that time it's too late. So they just don't want to chance it.
Ok, like I said I'm not there. So I have to rely on the CBC and such But this is weird, You say it is distributed in Canada, but no company IS or wants to carry it..... But, it's being distributed and seen in Canada so somebody is...What is it, some greedy left or right coast company here in the US? Or, please don't tell me it's the French..
It has been approved for distribution, but isn't being distributed because there are no takers. The approval simply means it is now legal to carry Al-Jazeera.
And 24/7 of "Seinfeld" reruns (which Toronto broadcasts in place of the channel which carries "Fox News" in Buffalo) is a celebration of Canadian culture?
Hon. Liza Frulla (Minister of Canadian Heritage and Minister responsible for Status of Women, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, as hon. members know, out-of-market radio stations must apply through the CRTC. The CRTC determines whether or not a given station can broadcast in Canada. For example, RAI, an Italian radio station, is currently under consideration at the CRTC, and we anxiously await its conclusion.
Mr. James Rajotte (EdmontonLeduc, CPC): Mr. Speaker, it is actually slightly incorrect to state that Fox News is not broadcast in Canada because there is one place in Canada where Fox News is broadcast, and that is on Parliament Hill. The Liberals prevent this channel from being shown to ordinary Canadians because it might be scary, but at the same they can view it from their offices in Ottawa. Why the double standard? Why do the Liberals deny to Canadians a news channel that they themselves enjoy?
Hon. Liza Frulla (Minister of Canadian Heritage and Minister responsible for Status of Women, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, first, I think that we are all very well served in terms of information in Canada. Second, there is also a need to protect, on the one hand, access to information and, on the other hand, our Canadian industries. These Canadian industries account for $26 billion and 740, 000 jobs in Canada.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.