Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mhking
With a second look it doesn't seem so bad. My initial reaction was based on info from the MSM -- will I ever learn. Or maybe I just didn't read things close enough. It appears that Williams was responsible for getting the advertising for his show and one of his clients ended up being the government. If his syndicators understood that this was the arrangement, and that he was self-employed and not on someone's editorial staff, then no lines were crossed. It was basically no different than E&P accepting money for an ad from a newspaper that they write about-- which they do all the time.

. . .and Robert Novak (who has faced ethics questions of his own after outing an undercover CIA agent in his Chicago Sun-Times/Creators Syndicate column).

This gratutious smear against Novak bugs me exponentially more than what Williams is accused of.

17 posted on 01/10/2005 5:26:54 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Tribune7

Where did the remark about Novak come from? I couldn't find it in Armstrongs column. (And while I'm asking questions, who is E&P?)


22 posted on 01/10/2005 6:30:32 AM PST by murdoog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson