Posted on 01/12/2005 10:57:57 AM PST by Pharmboy
Villagers digging in China's rich fossil beds have uncovered the preserved remains of a tiny dinosaur in the belly of a mammal, a startling discovery for scientists who have long believed early mammals couldn't possibly attack and eat a dinosaur.
Scientists say the animal's last meal probably is the first proof that mammals hunted small dinosaurs some 130 million years ago. It contradicts conventional evolutionary theory that early mammals were timid, chipmunk-sized creatures that scurried in the looming shadow of the giant reptiles.
In this case, the mammal was about the size of a large opossum, and the victim was a 5-inch "parrot dinosaur."
A second mammal fossil found at the same site claims the distinction of being the largest early mammal ever found. It's about the size of a modern dog, a breathtaking 20 times larger than most mammals living in the early Cretaceous Period.
Considering the specimens in tandem, scientists suggest the period in which these animals lived may have been much different than is commonly understood as the Age of Dinosaurs — a time dominated by long-necked, 85-ton plant-eaters and the emergence of terrifying theropod hunters with bladelike teeth and sickle claws.
It appears that at least some smaller dinosaurs had to look over their shoulders for snarling, meat-eating mammals claiming the same turf.
"This new evidence gives us a drastically new picture," said paleontologist Meng Jin of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, a co-author of the study in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature.
Other scientists who did not work on the bones described the discoveries as "exhilarating."
"This size range really has surprised everybody," said Zhexi Luo of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh, who digs in the same area of northeast China. "It dispels the conventional wisdom."
The fossils were found more than two years ago in Liaoning province. The specimens were taken to a Beijing lab, where they were cleaned and analyzed by Chinese and American scientists.
The dinosaur-eater belongs to a species called Repenomamus robustus, known previously from skull fragments.
This squat, toothy specimen is more complete; lying on its side, it measures a little less than 2 feet long, and probably weighed about 15 pounds.
On R. robustus' left side and under the ribs in the location of its stomach are the fragmented remains of a very young Psittacosaurus.
This common, fast-moving plant-eater is known as the "parrot dinosaur" because it had a small head with a curved, horny beak. Its arms were much shorter than its legs. Adults grew to be 6 feet long, but the one that was devoured was just 5 inches.
The remains still are recognizable, indicating that R. robustus ripped its prey like a crocodile, but probably had not developed the ability to chew food like more advanced mammals.
"We can still see articulated limb bones," Meng said. "It must have swallowed food in large hunks without being chewed."
The larger, second fossil also is a Repenomamus, but considerably larger. It measures more than 3 feet long and probably weighed more than 30 pounds. Scientists have named it R. giganticus.
It weighed 20 times more than most of the 290 known early mammal species, Meng said. Its head is 50 percent larger than R. robustus and its body was larger than some dinosaurs living in the region.
Being so much larger means that R. giganticus probably behaved differently than most other early mammals, which ate insects and seeds. A larger mammal could roam and hunt aggressively, preying on young dinosaurs.
"Giganticus is in a league by itself," Luo said. "It's the world champion so far for body mass in any Mesozoic mammal."
This new class of predatory mammals has set off new speculation.
Originally, scientists believed that mammals remained small because larger dinosaurs were hunting them. Only after dinosaurs went extinct by 65 million years ago did surviving mammals begin to grow larger, they reasoned.
Now, the presence of larger mammals is reversing some of the speculation. The Liaoning region already is famous for its trove of small feathered dinosaurs and early birds.
"Maybe small dinosaurs got larger — or got off the ground — to avoid rapacious mammals," wonders Duke University paleontologist Anne Weil.
Equally mysterious is how these specimens died in the same area at the same time. Neither show evidence of being hunted themselves.
The Yixian rock formation in which their bones were encased was a combination of river sediments and volcanic ash called tuff. The formation also includes the fossils of insects, frogs and other creatures, suggesting a mass die-off.
"It's possible that poisonous volcanic gas killed the animals when they were sleeping," Meng said. "Then there was a catastrophic explosion that buried the whole thing."
"Git in mah belly!"
Ping
Headline is misleading.
I thought the proved the dinosaur ate the mammal, big whoop.
Turns out to be interesting.
And, "That parrot dinosaur's not dead...he's sleeping."
After clicking the headline, I was expecting to see a picture of either Helen Thomas or Madeline Albright.
...though he hastened to add, "but this doesn't mean that we aren't certain about anything! I mean, we're not certain about some things -- but we're certain that evolution is an established fact, and all forms of creationism are impossible! Scientifically!"
Dan
You're right about that, but we're making slooooow progress.
Mmmmmmm.... dinosaurs....
LOL!
No, 'e's pining for the fjords!
(Well, someone had to say it!)
When you find a tooth and imagine all sorts of things are possible. From that tooth a good scientist can guess, skin color, social structure, and even the thoughts of the animal.
Dang guessers!
Could have found a dead one, been a Scavenger. No proof of predator activity here. Just that it eats meat.
Any comments from the "Young Earth" crowd? (I'm a Believer but still trying to sort through the "Young Earth" vs. "Old Earth" stuff).
What's next?
A Victor Mature lookalike in a dinosaur belly?
The plot thickens...
Every piece of evidence that contradicts the unfounded suppositions of evolutionists convinces a few and hardens the heads and hearts of many others.
Other scientists who did not work on the bones described the discoveries as "exhilarating."
That would be the title of anybody that runs for NY senator next term: The Exhilarator.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.