Posted on 01/14/2005 6:16:19 AM PST by areafiftyone
In a deal reminiscent of Armstrong Williams' arrangement with Bush administration, Howard Dean's presidential campaign has admitted it paid two pro-Democrat Internet bloggers to keep them from supporting other candidates.
The two bloggers hired by the former Vermont governor were Jerome Armstrong, who publishes the blog MyDD, and Markos Zuniga, who publishes the popular DailyKos, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday. They were paid $3,000 a month for four months.
During the presidential campaign, the DailyKos received as many as one million hits daily.
The deal was first revealed earlier this week by Zephyr Teachout, the former head of Internet outreach for the Dean campaign, on her own Web log, Zonkette.
While Armstrong and Zuniga never expressly committed to support Dean in exchange for the cash, Teachout explained that favorable coverage "was very clearly, internally, our goal."
While Mr. Williams' arrangement was relatively unique in GOP circles, the Democratic Party has a long history of cozying up to journalists, trading favors and bankrolling media operations in the expectation of positive media coverage.
As NewsMax recounted yesterday, celebrated liberal talk radio host Ed Schultz confessed to the "Today Show" last January that his network was bankrolled by $2 million in donations from Democrats.
Al Franken's Air America radio network has a similar financial arrangement with party fat cats.
Liberal Democrat donor Sheldon Drobny founded Franken's network, sold it and then helped raise money when the original management was ousted.
Sometimes the cozy relationship has gotten Democrat-leaning media outlets into trouble.
In July 1999, for instance, Boston's taxpayer funded TV-station WGBH was caught red-handed sharing its donor lists with the Democratic National Committee.
"The practice of swapping names was discovered when The Boston Globe reported that Sam Black, a 4-year-old boy who watches public TV's 'Barney,' had been receiving mail from the DNC," the Associated Press reported at the time.
The scandal metastasized, implicating dozens of PBS outlets in the illicit arrangement - including at least one instance of a direct cash payment.
"In February, [1999] the DNC asked [WGBH] for an additional 20,000 names in exchange for the names of 9,800 Democratic donors and $900," the AP said.
In a 1994 case that received far less attention, two Republican congressmen complained that senior Clinton administration official Susan Brophy had promised that the Boston Globe's Thomas Oliphant would write favorable columns about them if they voted for Clinton's crime bill.
"She said if I voted yes, she would request Oliphant to write something favorable about me," Republican Peter Torkildsen told the Boston Herald. "I was a little caught off guard."
Torkildsen's GOP colleague, Peter Blute, said Brophy had made a 'similar' pitch to him.
"She said [the White House] could be helpful with the regional press in Boston," Blute told the Herald. "She mentioned the Globe and she mentioned Oliphant."
Mr. Oliphant angrily denied that he had agreed to help the White House by trading his column for House votes. "Nothing I write or have ever written is on anybody else's authority but my own, and anyone who suggests otherwise is a scumbag," he told the Herald.
But after Blute supported the Clinton legislation, the Globe scribe praised him in print. Torkildsen's vote against the bill was denounced in a separate Oliphant column as a "smarmy move."
I believe that LittleGreenFootballs is also covering the story...
Ya think the MSM will pick this up? NAH!
Just remember -- THE LIBS ALWAYS ACCUSE THEIR OPPONENTS OF DOING EXACTLY WHAT THEY DO!!! (without fail)...
I hate to rub my own lamp but:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1201206/posts
bump
Whether of not the Dems have done the same thing as Williams is another story, but it's not this story.
=====
Not the point that I made. It's the pattern, and it is typical Dem behavior.
Newsmax seems to have a great deal of difficulty in understanding the difference between tax dollars used for illegal purposes and private money used for legal purposes.
I find it amusing when Democrats and Republicans start accusing each other of Corruption it's like the Pot calling the Kettle Black. Both parties are awash in a sea of Corruption, and the People both Dems and Reps are too blind to see it.
======
Agreed -- this is why I am so skeptical about Washington's motives and purpose -- I am one who is AWARE and NOT COMPLACENT like so many of the people you mention. That is why Washington does what it does, and GETS AWAY WITH WHAT IT DOES. If you put a fox in your hen house, it will eat the chickens --- but if you stop the fox, they chickens will be fat, happy and alive!!! :-)
And this is a shock why? Dems buy their loyalty every election year with more government handouts.
The Democratic party has no Soul or Values of any sort... moral or otherwise.
Well , well, well.
Everybody knows it's not a crime unless Republicans do it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.