Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fossil shows baby dinosaur in mammal's belly
CNN.com Space & Science ^ | 1/13/05 | AP

Posted on 01/16/2005 7:22:34 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature

DENVER, Colorado (AP) -- Villagers digging in China's rich fossil beds have uncovered the preserved remains of a tiny dinosaur in the belly of a mammal, a startling discovery for scientists who have long believed early mammals couldn't possibly attack and eat a dinosaur.

Scientists say the animal's last meal probably is the first proof that mammals hunted small dinosaurs some 130 million years ago. It contradicts conventional evolutionary theory that early mammals were timid, chipmunk-sized creatures that scurried in the looming shadow of the giant reptiles.

More at link...

(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: archeology; dinosaur; dinosaurs; mammals; zoology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 01/16/2005 7:22:43 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

times like these make me laugh at those who mock creationism.


2 posted on 01/16/2005 7:25:08 PM PST by mabelkitty (Blackwell for Governor in 2006!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

Stand by for an Evolution cover-up!


3 posted on 01/16/2005 7:25:26 PM PST by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

It probably was the mammal's last meal, if momma dino caught the little trickster pilfering the egg nest.


4 posted on 01/16/2005 7:27:48 PM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zzen01; mabelkitty

It is a great article, I hope you got to the link ok. CNN wont let the whole article be posted. I agree with both of your BTW.


5 posted on 01/16/2005 7:28:08 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (If Islam is a religion of peace they better fire their PR guy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ursus arctos horribilis

Then, wouldn't you have expected to find the mammal in the belly of the mother?


6 posted on 01/16/2005 7:28:46 PM PST by freakboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

I see another evolution in the theory of evolution on the horizon.


7 posted on 01/16/2005 7:29:49 PM PST by so_real ("The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty
21st century science:

1) Begin with our conclusion: Evolution and its required timeline are known to be true.
2) Absorb new information revealed through seemingly anomalous discoveries.
3) Create wild conjectures, which might explain why the anomalies are perfectly ordinary, provided that 6 or 7 other things are also true, although no such evidence has yet been found.
4) Re-assert the conclusion that Evolution and its required timeline are known to be true.
5) Laugh at the ignorant doubters of Evolution and call them names.

8 posted on 01/16/2005 7:31:24 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

those dang mammals will eat anything. No wonder we have an obesity problem. Bwahahahahaha!


9 posted on 01/16/2005 7:32:12 PM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

"It contradicts conventional evolutionary theory that early mammals were timid, chipmunk-sized creatures that scurried in the looming shadow of the giant reptiles."

Actually, your average dinosaur was not that big. The more well-known ones were very large, but I believe the average was around the size of a pony. It's also known that dinosaur eggs weren't that big either, so 5-inch hatchling isn't exactly shocking.

The only real discovery here seems to be that they found a new species of mammal that was larger than any other living at the time (although still relatively small, only about 3 feet long). This is hardly evidence against evolution.


10 posted on 01/16/2005 7:36:39 PM PST by Sofa King (MY rights are not subject to YOUR approval.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The best case of this is the punctuated equilibrium. Hmmm, lets see we have no evidence that clearly proves, without a doubt, that evolution is true so lets make up a theory to show why there is no evidence for evolution to be found that proves evolution exists but we just can't see it in the evidence. Brilliant...


11 posted on 01/16/2005 7:37:57 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (If Islam is a religion of peace they better fire their PR guy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty
"long believed early mammals couldn't possibly attack and eat a dinosaur."

This is evidence that a mammal would eat dinosaur meat. Not evidence of an "attack". The mammal could just as easily been scavenging.

12 posted on 01/16/2005 7:46:09 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

Evolution is a theory. Taught in the government schools as fact.
The only truth is that we don't know. I'm okay with that.


13 posted on 01/16/2005 7:46:37 PM PST by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freakboy

"Then, wouldn't you have expected to find the mammal in the belly of the mother?"

Duh, did story relate the dino egg had a meat eating momma? Could have been an early day herbivore veggie bovine predecessor.


14 posted on 01/16/2005 7:49:48 PM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
Evolution is a fact and eventually all but religious fanatics will forget creationism. It is only a matter of time until science unravels the natural answers.
If you want to teach the flat earth, keep your kids home and they can work at a fast food joint flipping burgers.
15 posted on 01/16/2005 7:52:43 PM PST by Step_Into_the_Void (Republican libertarians rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg

I agree 100%. It's really as simple as that.


16 posted on 01/16/2005 7:53:20 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (If Islam is a religion of peace they better fire their PR guy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

This is the problem with most of these stories: they're written by journalists, not scientists, and they don't always know enough to be scientifically accurate.


17 posted on 01/16/2005 7:54:53 PM PST by Sofa King (MY rights are not subject to YOUR approval.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Step_Into_the_Void
Make sure you understand the difference between "Creationism" and "Intelligent Design Theory." It appears here that IDT is being superimposed into the Creationism model and I am guilty of it as well. My support is for the theory of IDT and I am not anti-evolution, but evolution is also just a theory.

An interesting note also is that as you stated, so evolution states, "all we need is more time." I thought that was kinda of ironic.

18 posted on 01/16/2005 7:57:10 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (If Islam is a religion of peace they better fire their PR guy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Step_Into_the_Void

Evolution is a theory. It says so in the story.
Maybe if you shout louder and insult more, we will all be convinced of your silly position. But again, maybe not.
I never advocated a "flat earth", and you are using a "straw man" argument. I am not a "religious fanatic", here you use the "ad hominem" attack.
This is no serious argument you make, just name calling. Why is it so hard to admit that you don't know something?


19 posted on 01/16/2005 8:01:42 PM PST by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

Any idea what kind of bar-b-que sauce was used?


20 posted on 01/16/2005 8:03:13 PM PST by mnehring (Fear leads to the Dark Side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to the DNC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson