[OldSmaj]

The judge excluded statements Akbar made to two sergeants who guarded him after the attack, saying Akbar had not yet been informed of his legal rights.

What the hell?

If I recall, the two NCO's were guarding him (as well as protecting him) and did not question him, alledgedly did not even speak to him.

Any statement made spontaneously is admissable, other than hearsay, regardless of whether one has been advised of their rights.

Or has the liberal, warm-and-fuzzies, birkenstock-wearers been able to influence the content of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

And, lest we forget, this puke is subject to the UCMJ, not civilian law, regardless what his name is and CAIR be damned.

[Just Dan]

Finally, 101st justice ping.

[Just Dan]

Finally, 101st justice ping.