Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker
Genetic studies estimate that Homo sapiens arose about 200,000 years ago, so the new research brings the fossil record more in line with that, said John Fleagle of Stony Brook University in New York, an author of the study.

Isn't it safe to say that 200,000 is still an educated guess?
As I recall, "Lucy" is about 6 million years. That leaves quite a gap and quite a story about the possible timing and development of the transition(s)...

5 posted on 02/16/2005 11:06:54 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: longshadow; Right Wing Professor; furball4paws; Doctor Stochastic; Ichneumon

bttt for later read.


9 posted on 02/16/2005 11:09:49 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Publius6961
Lucy is 3.6 - 3 million years old and belongs to the Australopethicus category, not homo sapien.
10 posted on 02/16/2005 11:13:14 AM PST by Anna1345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Publius6961
Isn't it safe to say that 200,000 is still an educated guess?

The evidence suggests that homo sapiens arose around 200,000 years ago. Obviously the exact date isn't clear, but this is an example of evolutionary science predicting results before they're discovered.

As I recall, "Lucy" is about 6 million years. That leaves quite a gap and quite a story about the possible timing and development of the transition(s)...

3.2 million years, but yes, there's a huge difference between Lucy and early homo sapiens, but its not a "gap". We know about homo ergaster, homo habilis, etc. in the intervening years.

11 posted on 02/16/2005 11:13:38 AM PST by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Publius6961
Except that Leakey found evidence of modern humans at a level lower than that of australopithecines.

AUSTRALOPITHECINES

Skull 1470

15 posted on 02/16/2005 11:21:22 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Publius6961
Isn't it safe to say that 200,000 is still an educated guess?
As I recall, "Lucy" is about 6 million years. That leaves quite a gap and quite a story about the possible timing and development of the transition(s)...

No gap. Lucy was an Australopithcine, and a fairly early on at that. Modern humans followed (and I believe overlap) archaic sapiens, and archaic sapiens followed (and I believe overlap) Homo erectus.

24 posted on 02/16/2005 11:46:28 AM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Publius6961
Isn't it safe to say that 200,000 is still an educated guess?

Yes, the terms 'reasonably good argument', 'more likely than not' and 'estimate' make that clear.

28 posted on 02/16/2005 11:55:12 AM PST by Publius Scipio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Publius6961

I'm not sure that Lucy was Homo Sapiens...I believe she was Homo Erectus, a distant predecessor.


270 posted on 02/17/2005 12:44:22 PM PST by infocats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Publius6961

See my comment in #417.


418 posted on 02/19/2005 4:27:16 AM PST by El Oviedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson