Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dinosaur's soft tissue recovered (evolution)
The Seattle Times ^ | 3/25/2005 | Randolph E. Schmid

Posted on 03/28/2005 6:50:09 PM PST by johnnyb_61820

For more than a century, the study of dinosaurs has been limited to fossilized bones. Now, researchers have recovered 70-million-year-old soft tissue, including what may be blood vessels and cells, from a Tyrannosaurus rex.

If scientists can isolate proteins from the material, they may be able to learn new details of how dinosaurs lived, said lead researcher Mary Higby Schweitzer of North Carolina State University.

(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: creation; dinosaur; dna; evolution; maryschweitzer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
Soft tissue surviving for 70 million years? The reason that this hasn't happened before is likely because scientists weren't looking for it, because they had assumed that the age of 70 million years was correct, and they had assumed that therefore such soft tissue could no longer be present.

What else can be discovered when we stop making materialistic assumptions about the universe?

1 posted on 03/28/2005 6:50:12 PM PST by johnnyb_61820
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820

"What else can be discovered when we stop making materialistic assumptions about the universe?"



Dino-jerky.


2 posted on 03/28/2005 6:51:10 PM PST by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820
I think we need to retitle this one to "Dinosaur's soft tissue recovered (refrigeration)

(NOTE: for the most part "soft tissues" were never searched for under the presumption that almost all of them had rotted shortly after the animal died and that fossilization processes didn't serve to preserve more than a few "images". What we have here is a fossilization process that preserved the tissues, although not exactly the same way they were in life. This is not, as it were, preserved meat!)

3 posted on 03/28/2005 6:54:20 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820

If they can do DNA analysis, I predict that it will show that birds did not evolve from dinosaurs. Of course they won't admit that, they will just say "the unknown common ancestor is further back in time than the 120 million years that we thought."


4 posted on 03/28/2005 6:54:44 PM PST by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ahban

If you'd ever spend some time engaged in conversations with the birds you'd know right off that they are dinosaur descendants.


5 posted on 03/28/2005 6:55:53 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820

Jurassic Jerky


6 posted on 03/28/2005 6:56:33 PM PST by Uncledave (I want blue fingers!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Little birdie told ya?


7 posted on 03/28/2005 6:57:01 PM PST by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820

I always thought "Jurassic Park" was a stupid name considerin most of the dinosaurs in that movie were Cretaceous.

8 posted on 03/28/2005 6:57:03 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820

What really has scientists puzzled is that the soft tissue matches a DNA sample take from Hillary Clinton during her last ugly surgery in 2001.


9 posted on 03/28/2005 6:59:23 PM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820
Neanderthal "man" has been found to have no human DNA. That would make what they have some kind of animal bones. They're critter dudes!
10 posted on 03/28/2005 7:00:15 PM PST by concerned about politics (Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820
Dinosaur's soft tissue recovered

Lucky dinosaur ... where they able to reattach it?

11 posted on 03/28/2005 7:00:30 PM PST by usgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820

12 posted on 03/28/2005 7:01:19 PM PST by kingattax (If you're cross-eyed and dyslexic, can you read all right ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820
If they can resurrect the dinosaur that ate the lawyer, I say have at it and make a lot of 'em.
13 posted on 03/28/2005 7:02:14 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (Some say what's good for others, the others make the goods; it's the meddlers against the peddlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usgator

"Lucky dinosaur ... where they able to reattach it?"


Victim of a Lorenabobbitasaur?


14 posted on 03/28/2005 7:04:05 PM PST by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820
Fossilized soft tissue. Not organic tissue, rock.
15 posted on 03/28/2005 7:04:36 PM PST by Cruising Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Mad Magazine called it "Jur-ass-has-had-it Park"


16 posted on 03/28/2005 7:04:36 PM PST by dandi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Victim of a Lorenabobbitasaur?

Damn it!  I tried to think of a Bobbit reference but couldn't ... good call!

17 posted on 03/28/2005 7:05:58 PM PST by usgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: johnnyb_61820

Does create a bit of a problem, doesn't it?


18 posted on 03/28/2005 7:09:47 PM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

rofl!


19 posted on 03/28/2005 7:11:06 PM PST by Frapster (Don't mind me - I'm distracted by the pretty lights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ahban
If you'd ever spend some time engaged in conversations with the birds you'd know right off that they are dinosaur descendants.

This is best accomplished by those who are "Bird Brains". I doubt you qualify, however the fellow who suggested it seems to possess the ideal IQ for such dialoguing.

20 posted on 03/28/2005 7:11:34 PM PST by Boiler Plate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson