Skip to comments.
Dinosaur's soft tissue recovered (evolution)
The Seattle Times ^
| 3/25/2005
| Randolph E. Schmid
Posted on 03/28/2005 6:50:09 PM PST by johnnyb_61820
For more than a century, the study of dinosaurs has been limited to fossilized bones. Now, researchers have recovered 70-million-year-old soft tissue, including what may be blood vessels and cells, from a Tyrannosaurus rex.
If scientists can isolate proteins from the material, they may be able to learn new details of how dinosaurs lived, said lead researcher Mary Higby Schweitzer of North Carolina State University.
(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.nwsource.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: creation; dinosaur; dna; evolution; maryschweitzer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Soft tissue surviving for 70 million years? The reason that this hasn't happened before is likely because scientists weren't looking for it, because they had assumed that the age of 70 million years was correct, and they had assumed that therefore such soft tissue could no longer be present.
What else can be discovered when we stop making materialistic assumptions about the universe?
To: johnnyb_61820
"What else can be discovered when we stop making materialistic assumptions about the universe?"
Dino-jerky.
2
posted on
03/28/2005 6:51:10 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
To: johnnyb_61820
I think we need to retitle this one to "Dinosaur's soft tissue recovered (refrigeration)
(NOTE: for the most part "soft tissues" were never searched for under the presumption that almost all of them had rotted shortly after the animal died and that fossilization processes didn't serve to preserve more than a few "images". What we have here is a fossilization process that preserved the tissues, although not exactly the same way they were in life. This is not, as it were, preserved meat!)
3
posted on
03/28/2005 6:54:20 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: johnnyb_61820
If they can do DNA analysis, I predict that it will show that birds did not evolve from dinosaurs. Of course they won't admit that, they will just say "the unknown common ancestor is further back in time than the 120 million years that we thought."
4
posted on
03/28/2005 6:54:44 PM PST
by
Ahban
To: Ahban
If you'd ever spend some time engaged in conversations with the birds you'd know right off that they are dinosaur descendants.
5
posted on
03/28/2005 6:55:53 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: johnnyb_61820
6
posted on
03/28/2005 6:56:33 PM PST
by
Uncledave
(I want blue fingers!!!)
To: muawiyah
7
posted on
03/28/2005 6:57:01 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
To: johnnyb_61820
I always thought "Jurassic Park" was a stupid name considerin most of the dinosaurs in that movie were Cretaceous.
8
posted on
03/28/2005 6:57:03 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: johnnyb_61820
What really has scientists puzzled is that the soft tissue matches a DNA sample take from Hillary Clinton during her last ugly surgery in 2001.
To: johnnyb_61820
Neanderthal "man" has been found to have no human DNA. That would make what they have some kind of animal bones. They're critter dudes!
To: johnnyb_61820
Dinosaur's soft tissue recovered Lucky dinosaur ... where they able to reattach it?
11
posted on
03/28/2005 7:00:30 PM PST
by
usgator
To: johnnyb_61820
12
posted on
03/28/2005 7:01:19 PM PST
by
kingattax
(If you're cross-eyed and dyslexic, can you read all right ?)
To: johnnyb_61820
If they can resurrect the dinosaur that ate the lawyer, I say have at it and make a lot of 'em.
13
posted on
03/28/2005 7:02:14 PM PST
by
LoneRangerMassachusetts
(Some say what's good for others, the others make the goods; it's the meddlers against the peddlers)
To: usgator
"Lucky dinosaur ... where they able to reattach it?"
Victim of a Lorenabobbitasaur?
14
posted on
03/28/2005 7:04:05 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
To: johnnyb_61820
Fossilized soft tissue. Not organic tissue, rock.
To: Paleo Conservative
Mad Magazine called it "Jur-ass-has-had-it Park"
16
posted on
03/28/2005 7:04:36 PM PST
by
dandi
To: cripplecreek
Victim of a Lorenabobbitasaur? Damn it! I tried to think of a Bobbit reference but couldn't ... good call!
17
posted on
03/28/2005 7:05:58 PM PST
by
usgator
To: johnnyb_61820
Does create a bit of a problem, doesn't it?
18
posted on
03/28/2005 7:09:47 PM PST
by
Blogger
To: cripplecreek
19
posted on
03/28/2005 7:11:06 PM PST
by
Frapster
(Don't mind me - I'm distracted by the pretty lights.)
To: Ahban
If you'd ever spend some time engaged in conversations with the birds you'd know right off that they are dinosaur descendants. This is best accomplished by those who are "Bird Brains". I doubt you qualify, however the fellow who suggested it seems to possess the ideal IQ for such dialoguing.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson