Posted on 05/13/2005 7:35:08 AM PDT by Mike Bates
The '60s represent many things to many people, but did that same era of sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll also inspire the revolution in personal computing?
That remains an unconventional reading of contemporary history. You could just as easily argue that heavy investment in military research was the moving force. Same goes for pro-market tax policies. But a generation of pot smokers and draft dodgers?
Needless to say, it has the makings of a feisty barroom debate. Still, don't dismiss the argument out of hand. In fact, Whole Earth Catalog founder Stewart Brand made a convincing try a decade ago.
In an essay he wrote for Time magazine in 1995, Brand maintained that the communal and libertarian outlook espoused during the hippie era spawned the seeds that later bore fruit in the form of the modern cyberrevolution. "At the time, it all seemed dangerously anarchic (and still does to many), but the counterculture's scorn for centralized authority provided the philosophical foundations of not only the leaderless Internet but also the entire personal-computer revolution."
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.com ...
I think MLK had more to do with changing discrimination than any hippies did.
Alkhin
The most important American political changes in the Sixties were the Civil Rights Act (1964) and the Voting Rights Act (1965). Nothing's been quite the same since.
All the cultural stuff was, you know, mostly just for fun. No harm, no foul! ;-)
---------------------------------------------
Exactly. If you were not there then your only knowledge about hippies would come from hollywood and we all know how good they are at accurately depicting any era or group. Besides, how many true hippies do you think there were? Maybe ten thousand? (and that's probably a generous estimate). By 1969 (Woodstock) the genuine hippie movement was long dead (hell, Laugh In had been poking holes in their boat for years by then). The concert was mostly a herd of wannabees without a clue. What was left was a fringe-dwelling element who played the part but mostly just got high. And most of these losers are now suburbanites worried about their 401ks or postal workers already collecting.
the internet, with apologies to aLGore, was created by the U.S. MILITARY - not dope smokers from '60s hell.
What BS! The personal computer revolution was due to electronics geeks, and the Internet was due to the desire of the Armed Forces and technical departments of universities to communicate on their research efforts.
-------------------------------------------
You have to add the anti-war movement.
I have even less use for hippies!
More BS. The personal computer was pushed by Commodore well before Apple came on the scene.
What I'm saying is , if you werent there, you dont know how it was. It is your violence-laden language that is radical. I was a freshman in college in 1966. The Vietnam War was ramping up big time. IT was the focus for a lot of us as far as our politics went in those days. I was living in Austin then and if you wanted drugs, I didnt, the biggest dealer was in a fraternity. I knew a lot of people in " radical politics " and none of them were Communists. I always had a job and bathed every day. Do Goths take baths/showers? This idea that " Hippies " were all dirty,smelly communists is just nonsense. You'd probably be shocked to learn how many Freepers my age used to have long hair and wore funny looking clothes. Your ridiculous comments serve no purpose.
I should have said Commodore and Altair.
One thing I've always noticed - the hippies always put pressure on the free countries to "stop fighting". It never occured to them that they ought to be applying that pressure on the tyrannies that the free countries are trying to destroy. Indeed, the hippies rather like the tyrannies...even if they'd never dream of going to live in one of them.
Regards, Ivan
BUT NOOOOOOO. I just see the Civil Rights Act as a precursor to rewriting the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. THAT's wrong.
MadIvan, you rock on
Review what I said...apart from hanging Jane Fonda, I called mostly for humiliation of people associated with the "hippie movement".
I was a freshman in college in 1966. The Vietnam War was ramping up big time. IT was the focus for a lot of us as far as our politics went in those days.
And the hippies were totally wrong. It never occured to them to support a war to eliminate an enemy that was intent on enslaving the people of Vietnam. Hitherto, it had never been socially acceptable to support a tyranny in a war against one's own country. The protestors I saw on the streets of Washington during Gulf War I (yes, I was there) showed that this idiocy had persisted...and still does so.
I was living in Austin then and if you wanted drugs, I didnt, the biggest dealer was in a fraternity.
Illogical. Your personal experience with the biggest dealer in Austin doesn't mean the hippies weren't using drugs heavily. And you call me uninformed?
I knew a lot of people in " radical politics " and none of them were Communists.
All right. We'll call them Communist sympathisers since they wanted the regime in Vietnam to persist. They were still wrong, and it was their ilk that have given rise to a wastrel classs in politics today.
I always had a job and bathed every day.
Irrelevant. I am talking about the hippies in general, you are trying to counter that assertion with a case of one, namely yourself.
Do Goths take baths/showers?
Rolling around in the mud for fun was a preoccupation at Woodstock I'm afraid, not generally at Cure concerts.
This idea that " Hippies " were all dirty,smelly communists is just nonsense.
Maybe you weren't, but that's just one case. Furthermore, I'm talking about the broader implications of the hippie movement - which were profoundly negative.
You'd probably be shocked to learn how many Freepers my age used to have long hair and wore funny looking clothes.
Certainly there are some. But most regret that time as one would regret having drunk too much the previous night.
Your ridiculous comments serve no purpose.
You are suffering from what psychologists would call "projection".
Ivan
They're blindly against war, even when there are just reasons for it. Most of the time their thinking is so twisted they can only identify with the plight of the poor tyrant that's about to be thrown out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.