Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eeper

< What's not to agree with? Jumping on someone and calling them names for innocently mentioning the name of a character in a Twain work seems like a great idea.

I honestly didn't even think twice about it until Mike freaked out. Who knew that the name of a character in a book that most of us (I would assume) read when we were children would be so offensive to mention in a thread revolving around the casting of said character? >




First of all, I don't think it was "innocently" mentioned. Everyone knows we just don't use it anymore unless you WANT to spark a battle.

Secondly, we all know that mentioning it would start something. None of us are innocents here. We all know the fire the word enflames whenever it is used in ANY context.

Personally, I think it's a shame that things are like that but they are. Let's just not hide behind "innocence".


51 posted on 05/22/2005 10:03:15 AM PDT by GOP_Proud (...stumbling across Bill Bennett on the radio is like bumping into Socrates at Starbucks.-K.Parker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: GOP_Proud

So I'm part of the neo-Nazi Twain plot now for mentioning the character's name? Christ, people...


55 posted on 05/22/2005 10:04:58 AM PDT by Eeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson