[Know your rights]

If the ad hominem fits

You've provided no evidence that it does.

[Che Chihuahua]

Your accusation of a sleazy ad hominem attack is misdirected and somewhat defensive. You are in the best position to know if the "sleazy ad hominems" fit you or not. If you are sincere in your beliefs that dope smoking is implicitly or explicitly a constitutionally protected activity, then more power to you. Otherwise, you are, so to speak, blowing smoke.

BTW, most courts and state jurisdictions have disagreed with your position on the basis that drug regulation is a part of governmental police powers concerning health and safety issues. My suggestion to you is to work to change the drug laws through political action. That approach seems to be working for gay activists.