BTW, tearing down a 500 year old building probably wasn't a good idea if ya' know what I mean ~ it's not like there are rich tourists who like to visit India just to see the new stuff.
Why Muslims insists on building their Mosque on somebody else's holy site? As for air-tight proof of Rama Temple's existence on the location, perhaps more research is in order.
I wonder how Muslims feel if Hindus construct Gnash Temple on Mecca or Karbela, even if not on top of Kabba or Imam Ali Shrine.
Muslims are invaders in India. That is not a question for rational human beings. Any Muslim presence in India is the result of invasion, occupation and the destruction of the local religion and culture. To dispute that makes anyone out to be a liar and fundamentally evil, on the face of it.
There are hundreds of web sites referring to a 1,000 year old Hindu temple on this same site, not the least of which is Wikipedia. If that left wing bunch of pro Muslim wing nuts acknowledge this simple fact, who am I to disagree. However, a simple Google search turns up hundreds of such sites relating to over a century of "professionally excavated evidence" of the previous occupation of the site by those other than Muslims.
The question itself is a canard and an insult to reasoned discussion. Muslims routinely destroy all the evidence they can of previous cultures and religions. Witness what they are doing now on Temple Mount and the grotesque destruction of the ancient Buddhas in Afghanistan. Muslims can't very well actively destroy evidence of history and then challenge their accusers "show me the evidence." The evidence of their lies is their destruction of the evidence. Because of the actions of Muslims the test MUST be "prove to me that Muslims have any claims to this site... EVER."
And I second the notion that 500 year old buildings are gross nouveau impositions on the history of the Indian sub continent.
Of course, there is an answer to Muslims in India, and elsewhere in the world. Do to them what they do to others. Wipe them out. Erase them from history. It's only fair.
Hmmm...you sound an awful lot like the Arabs who claim that there was never a temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Muslims are notorious for destroying and supplanting other religious shrines all around the world, and then eliminating evidence of the prior sites.