To: LibWhacker
Wow! Sounds like their "Kyoto Treaty" really worked!
To: LibWhacker
Wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that most of that warmth came during the period when the martian volcanoes were active. If the planet was always cold, then it would follow that a pretty good portion of the water it had is still there. Except for the stuff evaporated by the volcanoes, the only way it could lose water would be through sublimation of the ice on the planet's surface, and since much of the ice is subsurface, I would think that process would be pretty slow.
3 posted on
07/21/2005 2:01:39 PM PDT by
Little Pig
(Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
To: LibWhacker
They heard this through the grapevine?
4 posted on
07/21/2005 2:03:20 PM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: LibWhacker; Willie Green; xsmommy
Cold, yes, but as a youth I knew some hotties there.
To: LibWhacker
The study is bound to be controversial showing a disparity between those scientists who look at pictures of Mars to discern its history and those who study the only pieces of the planet we can examine in detail in the laboratory. Some disparity; on the order of having a copy of Hustler or hiring a street walker.
6 posted on
07/21/2005 2:12:51 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(As darkness is the absence of light, evil is the absence of good; innocence is blind.)
To: LibWhacker
"First, we evaluated what the meteorites could have experienced during ejection from Mars, 11 to 15 million years ago." Ah saying Mars has "always been cold and was rarely above freezing" based on a meteor sample "ejection from Mars, 11 to 15 million years ago."?..
By definition the meteor sample is only valid for data on Mars up till the time they were ejection from Mars...
you have a, 11 to 15 million years till now, data drop out there...
really puts a damper on making overall blanket assertion on the total Mars geo.history...don't you think?
8 posted on
07/21/2005 2:36:22 PM PDT by
tophat9000
(When the State ASSUMES death...It makes an ASH out of you and me..)
To: LibWhacker
The gas argon is present in the meteorites as well as in many rocks on Earth as a consequence of the radioactive decay of potassium. A noble gas, argon is not very chemically reactive, and because the decay rate is precisely known it can be used to date rocks ... if you assume there was no argon in the rock to begin with.
9 posted on
07/21/2005 2:40:52 PM PDT by
dartuser
(We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the complete works of Shakes)
To: LibWhacker
Was this chill caused by global warming caused by the little Martian people using fossil fuels to run their cars, heat their homes, fly their space ships to invade planet Earth?
10 posted on
07/21/2005 2:42:03 PM PDT by
RetiredArmy
(The government and courts are stealing your freedom & liberty!)
To: KevinDavis
12 posted on
07/21/2005 2:46:17 PM PDT by
Notforprophet
(Democrats have stood their own arguments on their heads so often that they now stand for nothing.)
To: LibWhacker
Mars has likely never been sufficiently warm for liquid water to have flowed on the surface for extended periods of time.
So the super giant canyon on mars was not made by erosion over a long period of time?
So if it was made in a relatively SHORT period of time,
where did that tremendous volume of water come from?
Where did it go?
13 posted on
07/21/2005 2:47:01 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: LibWhacker
That's horsepucky! It was only 3,894,216 years...
16 posted on
07/21/2005 3:03:27 PM PDT by
sonofatpatcher2
(Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
To: LibWhacker
Didn't the Elton John song "Rocket Man" say something about Mars not being a good place to raise your kids, in fact it's cold as hell?
To: LibWhacker
I only have records for about 3 1/2 billion years (mostly Elvis and Beatles), so they may be right.
To: LibWhacker
Four-billion-year chili on Mars?
21 posted on
07/21/2005 4:46:11 PM PDT by
mikrofon
(The "Red-hot" Planet)
22 posted on
07/23/2005 8:05:53 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
23 posted on
05/14/2006 5:44:03 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: 75thOVI; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; CGVet58; chilepepper; ckilmer; demlosers; ...
24 posted on
05/14/2006 5:45:00 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: LibWhacker
Why of course its cold on Mars. Without Bush or SUV's they couldn't possibly be experiencing global warming
To: LibWhacker
The Saroni are not worried.
28 posted on
11/08/2014 5:10:39 PM PST by
P.O.E.
(Pray for America)
To: LibWhacker
In fact it’s cold as Hell.
29 posted on
11/08/2014 5:12:37 PM PST by
dfwgator
(The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson