Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
These words might work...

This law is not subject to judicial review.

Article. III.
Section. 2.
Clause 2:

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

10 posted on 08/03/2005 10:48:50 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Sgt_Schultze

First, that would be put on a law, not an amendment.

Second, an activist judge would simply say that congress cannot legislate the jurisdiction of the supreme court to decide the constitutionality of the legislation because that would violate separation of powers.

If the court is interpreting the law and the constitution, they can say anything means anything they want.

Change the court, not the constitution.


13 posted on 08/03/2005 11:24:17 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson