Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Congressman Billybob

But would such a statement also protect a law that otherwise was obviously unconstitutional, as opposed to being simply open to an interpretation of its meaning or how it interacts with other laws?

For example, could congress and the white house pass a law saying that all congressmen have to be Catholic, and label it so as to prevent judicial review?

It doesn't seem like they should be able to do so, or that a court would interpret the constitution as allowing them to do so.


17 posted on 08/03/2005 1:39:20 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
You are getting into the "fundamental law" question I referred to but did not discuss in my reply. This is a complex subject that cannot be even adequately outlined in mere posts on FR. If you are seriously interested in the subject, spend about eight hours reading on Supreme Court jurisdiction, and then Freepmail me.

John / Billybob
19 posted on 08/03/2005 1:49:36 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush's SECOND appointment obey the Constitution? I give 95-5 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson