To: Swordmaker
If comets are so loose why would we need to divert one from a collision course with Earth?(USA #1 !!)
9 posted on
09/07/2005 12:29:42 AM PDT by
I see my hands
(Soon evacuees will have absolute moral authority and entitlement.)
To: I see my hands
If comets are so loose why would we need to divert one from a collision course with Earth?
Are we talking about this particular comet or all comets ?
12 posted on
09/07/2005 1:44:22 AM PDT by
CheezyChesster
(Not all that you see is fluff and puff !)
To: I see my hands
If comets are so loose why would we need to divert one from a collision course with Earth?Asteroids and meteroids are a different breed.
13 posted on
09/07/2005 2:05:00 AM PDT by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is a form of insanity)
To: I see my hands
If comets are so loose why would we need to divert one from a collision course with Earth?
A mass of a few million tons is still a few million tons regardless of density.
21 posted on
09/07/2005 3:15:22 AM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: I see my hands
If comets are so loose why would we need to divert one from a collision course with Earth?EPA regulations, probably. Clean Air Act, etc....can't have all those airborne particulates...it's against the law. (smirk)
24 posted on
09/07/2005 3:30:54 AM PDT by
ZinGirl
To: I see my hands
Basic physics.
Force = Mass x Acceleration.
Fluffiness doesn't enter the equation at all.
Either way, BLAMM!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson