Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Official Election Day 2005 Watch [Live Thread]
Shameless Vanity Post | November 8, 2005 | BillyBoy

Posted on 11/07/2005 11:46:41 PM PST by BillyBoy

My Fellow FReepers,

As it now past midnight (well at least for those of us in Central Standard Time) and I did a general search and couldn't find a single thread dedicated to election 2005, I have taken the liberty of creating one.

THIS is the place to post all your updates and discussions on '05 races around the country. From the Boston Mayoral Race to the fight for Virginia Attorney General, keep the adrenaline flowing here.

Will the GOP make a midterm gubernatorial comeback after suffering through the 2001 "mistakes" of McGreeley and Mark Warner? Will Ahnuld, the CA Dummycrats, or independent minded conservatives emerge triumph in California's latest (but not greatest!) "special election"? Will the liberal incumbent crush his equally liberal challenger in New York? And do conservatives even care?

Let's get the discussion rolling folks. You heard it here first!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Ohio; US: Texas; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: forrester; jerrykilgore; joinarnold; nj; noneed4alivethread; notbreakingnews; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,161-1,172 next last
To: Benkei

In contrast, I do agree that the Stockholders of Corporations together with the Board of Directors should approve any political donations at annual meetings together with the various other items to be voted on.

However, not everyone works for a Public Company and/or a Union. I don't! So, I know that i get my paycheck and if my Firm decides to donate to a particular group, it was not my money. It may have lowered my bonus or raise, but, that is not the Boss's problem. Retention is, but there is always another face to plant in any job.


81 posted on 11/08/2005 10:45:33 AM PST by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
I'll stick with CA State Sen. Tom McClintock's recommendations: YES on 73, 74, 75, 76, 77. NO on 78, 79, 80.

That's how I just voted.

82 posted on 11/08/2005 10:50:02 AM PST by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

yep...thats how i planned it...


83 posted on 11/08/2005 11:02:00 AM PST by chrispycsuf (our troops need our support now more than ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: conservativebabe

"Gosh, I love the excitement at election times! You know you are a true political junkie when elections are fun!"


LOL, I am in Oregon where there is no election today at all, yet I'm following this thread. I think that must make me a political junkie too!



84 posted on 11/08/2005 11:02:13 AM PST by Flamenco Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Simmy2.5

My prediction: Prop 75 will pass.
Many disgruntled state employees do not like being forced to give a cut of their paycheck to the Berkeley commies (unions).


85 posted on 11/08/2005 11:04:01 AM PST by La Enchiladita (Care packages for troops at www.opgratitude.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cgk

its actually not decided on by just retired judges...the create a new redistricting and the people of california vote on whether they like the way it is redistricted...i like it...it seems fair...the republican party i think is even paying to run yes vote commericals out here...tom mcclintock knows what he is talking about...remember...he was running as the more conservative person against the governator


86 posted on 11/08/2005 11:04:29 AM PST by chrispycsuf (our troops need our support now more than ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rockthecasbah

73 and 75 are likely winners...


87 posted on 11/08/2005 11:08:22 AM PST by La Enchiladita (Care packages for troops at www.opgratitude.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

What do you think about 74 as a likely winner?


88 posted on 11/08/2005 11:12:07 AM PST by rockthecasbah (4th down & a mile to go. 1:32 left in the 4th quarter. Down by 3 at Notre Dame. No problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: rockthecasbah

Prolly going down. We'll see.


89 posted on 11/08/2005 11:16:43 AM PST by La Enchiladita (Care packages for troops at www.opgratitude.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: SuperSonic
That's it!

Probably the only other amusing strip I come across, with the exception of Mallard Fillmore.

90 posted on 11/08/2005 11:28:42 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
2 and 3 look poised to pass.

According to whom?

91 posted on 11/08/2005 11:40:23 AM PST by ohioWfan (Take comfort, Friend George, God is with thee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

I asked this on another thread and didn't get an answer. Why are Republicans for redistricting in CA and not OH? Is it just because such a redistricting would be favorable to the GOP in one state and not in the other? That seems just a tad hypocritical to me, but maybe there's some substantive difference in how the initiatives are written.


92 posted on 11/08/2005 11:48:27 AM PST by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Flamenco Lady
You need help!

;-)

93 posted on 11/08/2005 11:54:03 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Flamenco Lady

"LOL, I am in Oregon where there is no election today at all, yet I'm following this thread. I think that must make me a political junkie too!"

I guess I am also. I got to vote for Mayor and 2 city council for my big town of 5000.


94 posted on 11/08/2005 11:59:57 AM PST by jimbergin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

"According to whom?"

Brit Hume on Fox News last night.


95 posted on 11/08/2005 12:10:15 PM PST by NapkinUser ("It is a damn poor mind indeed which can think of only one way to spell a word." -Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Okay. I already voted absentee, so this is purely academic, but what's your basis for a "NO" vote on 76? Isn't that givein the State Governor power that he had for many years prior anyway? Nothing neww, just restoring something old that would be a good tool to combat out-of-control spending in the Legislature?

Lay out your rationale, here.


96 posted on 11/08/2005 12:10:29 PM PST by HKMk23 (FOR SALE: French Army standard issue infantry rifles. Dropped once. Never fired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

> ...in CA who can trust ANY judge, retired or otherwise?

Does the name "Janice Rogers Brown" ring a bell with you??

As in, "Assoiciate California State Supreme Court Justice"?

Now, tell me again about all those bogeyman judges whom you may or may not trust.


97 posted on 11/08/2005 12:13:57 PM PST by HKMk23 (FOR SALE: French Army standard issue infantry rifles. Dropped once. Never fired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Marking for later reading...


98 posted on 11/08/2005 12:15:46 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Yes on 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78
No on 79, 80.
99 posted on 11/08/2005 12:16:18 PM PST by TeleStraightShooter (When Frist exercises his belated Constitutional "Byrd option", Reid will have a "Nuclear Reaction".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
PS -- I voted "NO" on 77 because it goes into effect BEFORE the people approve it, and continues in efect until another plan gets approved, which goes into effect BEFORE the people approve it, and continues...as nauseum

Even at that, if the new-but-not-yet-approved districting plan were an improvement over the present boundaries, having it go into effect BEFORE the people vote to approve it could be a functional benefit. That considered, though, I voted it down on the principle that nothing submitted to the people for a vote should go into effect until AFTER that vote has been cast.

100 posted on 11/08/2005 12:18:07 PM PST by HKMk23 (FOR SALE: French Army standard issue infantry rifles. Dropped once. Never fired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,161-1,172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson