Wouldn't that be more specifically Darwin's "sexual selection", rather than the more general "natural selection"?
Darwinists claim that good looks suppresses your immune system, and, thus, those surviving with good looks must be very strong in immunity. Eg. the peacock with the biggest feathers gets chosen coz that's the strongest who can fight the immune supression best.
However, let us not confuse Darwinism and materialism, ie. as in materials precede thought etc...
Many materialists have hijack darwinists and used them for their own Marxist political purposes...and FR reeks with such.
Yes.