Happy Bill of Rights Day! his Day In History BILL OF RIGHTS BECOMES LAW December 15, 1791

Following ratification by the state of Virginia, the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, known collectively as the Bill of Rights, become the law of the land.

In September 1789, the first Congress of the United States approved 12 amendments to the U.S. Constitution and sent them to the states for ratification. The amendments were designed to protect the basic rights of U.S. citizens, guaranteeing the freedom of speech, press, assembly, and exercise of religion; the right to fair legal procedure and to bear arms; and that powers not delegated to the federal government would be reserved for the states and the people.

Influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689, the Bill of Rights was also drawn from Virginia's Declaration of Rights, drafted by George Mason in 1776. Mason, a native Virginian, was a lifelong champion of individual liberties, and in 1787 he attended the Constitutional Convention and criticized the final document for lacking constitutional protection of basic political rights. In the ratification struggle that followed, Mason and other critics agreed to support the Constitution in exchange for the assurance that amendments would be passed immediately.

On December 15, 1791, Virginia became the 10th of 14 states to approve 10 of the 12 amendments, thus giving the Bill of Rights the two-thirds majority of state ratification necessary to make it legal. Of the two amendments not ratified, the first concerned the population system of representation, while the second prohibited laws varying the payment of congressional members from taking effect until an election intervened. The first of these two amendments was never ratified, while the second was finally ratified more than 200 years later, in 1992.

Too bad they didn't survive. Not to mention the ninnies who think that the BoR actually lists the only rights we have.

Not to mention the ninnies who think that the BoR only applies to the US government, and that State & local governments are free to infringe on any rights we have.

Amen to both of those. Amazing how many people are ignorant of what the Bill of Rights actually says....

The Annual Bill of Rights Day Celebration in Colorado will be different this year.

It will be at
Johnson's Corner in the conference Room
Saturday, December 17, 2005
Dinner will begin at 6:00 p.m.
Followed by Speakers
Dinner will be from the Johnson's Corner wonderful menu on separate checks.

Join Freedom Loving Patriots for an evening of Fellowship.

For more information and a recap of years past go here
http://www.lovelandnet.com/bord/

If you would like to give a short talk or set up a table contact Tom Buchanan
970-667-6269 or email me at minuteman05@msn.com

BILL OF RIGHTS, OR BILL OF 'WRONGS'

Certainly the Fourth Amendment has been misinterpreted for years. Why should a criminal suspect be given "rights"?
If a duly "warranted" police officer suspects that I have committed a crime, and believes that the evidence is in my house, why should he have to go to a judge to seek entry while I'm given time to destroy the evidence.

If I'm innocent and there is no evidence where's the harm done, and to whom?

If the President of the United States wants to listen in on my conversations to ANYONE (domestic or foreign) why shouldn't he be allowed to. If I'm guilty of anything and he or his organization finds out by my own admission over the telephone, why shouldn't I be prosecuted? If I am not doing any wrong where is the harm being done, and to whom?

The interpretation of the Fifth Amendment is another thing.

Anybody read about the man who confessed to killing his ex-girlfriend's 2 year old son? He killed the child 15 years ago, and was acquitted in court. Now in a remorseful state he admitted to police that he killed the lad and wants to be punished. Unfortunately he cannot be prosecuted because of the Fourth Amendment rule against double jeopardy.

This is ridiculous. The Double Jeopardy rule was meant to keep an overzealous prosecutor from retrying a person who has been found innocent and had proclaimed his own innocence. If he comes back and said he lied that should be enough to throw out the Rule.

These are cases where the Constitution's 10 Bill of Rights goes against our Lord's 10 Commandments. In most cases as I see them, the Bill of Rights should be called the Bill of Wrongs!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.