Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: angkor
Not so fast, angkor. This section, among others, was clearly violated by the wiretapping:

(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party;

As far as we know, United States citizens were eavesdropped on if they were involved with Al Qaeda. I don't have a problem with this, but this law does not cover what the White House did.
18 posted on 12/19/2005 4:49:42 AM PST by cwiz24 (I worked very hard on this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cwiz24

See #16.

You're right that "United States person" and "substantial likelihood" are issues, but not as simple as they seem at first glance.


26 posted on 12/19/2005 4:59:00 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson