Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/22/2005 10:46:34 AM PST by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: The_Victor

spoilsports ping


2 posted on 12/22/2005 10:48:04 AM PST by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

The search for life out there is distracting our investment funds from resource development.


3 posted on 12/22/2005 10:49:09 AM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

4 posted on 12/22/2005 10:50:34 AM PST by Michael Goldsberry (Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

Then how do we explain the existence of Democrats?


6 posted on 12/22/2005 10:50:48 AM PST by RockinRight (It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

I wonder if the Martians are debating if there is life on Earth!


9 posted on 12/22/2005 10:51:59 AM PST by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor
Studies Cast Doubt on Idea of Life on Mars

How much money did the pinheads at NASA spend to figure this out?!

10 posted on 12/22/2005 10:53:18 AM PST by Tamar1973 (There's NOTHING I need at 5 a.m., except more sleep!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

Until we put people there, we'll never know the answer.

And once they are there, of course the question is answered as there will be life on Mars.


12 posted on 12/22/2005 10:55:19 AM PST by AbeKrieger (Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

So much for objective truth. Same set of "facts", i.e., data, but different conclusions. I wonder if that applies to global warming.


13 posted on 12/22/2005 10:55:32 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

Aw rats. There were some among us who had absolute *faith* that signs of life would be found on Mars.


16 posted on 12/22/2005 10:58:06 AM PST by Antoninus (Hillary smiles every time a Freeper trashes Rick Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

Yeah? Then where is Democratic Underground broadcasting from?


18 posted on 12/22/2005 11:01:44 AM PST by pabianice (I guess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

 


20 posted on 12/22/2005 11:12:42 AM PST by Fintan (See??? Sometimes I do read the articles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor
"After two months of surveying, scientists announced that chemical and geological clues gathered by the rover showed liquid water once coursed over the rocks and soils at that spot on Mars."

Why no mention of the atmospheric pressure and temperature on Mars?

The conditions on Mars are average temperature = -63C, pressure = 4-8 millibar (depending on season).

Water is not very fluid at these conditons, if it can exist at all.

21 posted on 12/22/2005 11:15:58 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

The NASA scientists claiming signs of life on MARS have at least the appearance of a conflict of interest for so doing: it is a much better political "selling point" to keep the dollars flowing than if they found no life (which is much less sensational a headline).


22 posted on 12/22/2005 11:24:42 AM PST by freedomcrusader (Proudly wearing the politically incorrect label "crusader" since 1/29/2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Ping.


25 posted on 12/22/2005 11:34:53 AM PST by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

"Instead, the studies argue, the layered rock outcrops probed by NASA's robot rover Opportunity and interpreted as signs of ancient water could have been left by explosive volcanic ash or a meteorite impact eons ago."

Yeah, but when you call them that it doesn't drum up much support for NASA spending.


27 posted on 12/22/2005 11:49:01 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Victor

The presence of acidic water and sulfur dioxide would not preclude microbial life.


33 posted on 12/22/2005 12:29:33 PM PST by curmudgeonII (If you're a classicist read Gibbon's description of Emperor Phillip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972; KevinDavis
Ping!
34 posted on 12/28/2005 1:47:36 PM PST by SunkenCiv ("In silence, and at night, the Conscience feels that life should soar to nobler ends than Power.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ..

35 posted on 12/28/2005 6:14:52 PM PST by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Mars was 'always cold and frozen'
by David Cohen
New Scientist
22 August 2003
The idea that Mars was once a warm place, awash with oceans that could harboured early life has taken a knock - new data suggests it was always cold, frozen and probably lifeless. A survey of the Red Planet's surface has revealed only traces of carbonates, minerals that should have formed in abundant quantities if Mars once had expansive seas. On Earth, the mineral is found in limestone and chalk deposits around the world. The data was collected by a thermal emission spectrometer (TES) on NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and was analysed by researchers at Arizona State University in the US... "We found carbonate, but we've only trace amounts," said team leader Philip Christensen. "This really points to a cold, frozen, icy Mars that has probably always been that way. We believe that the relatively small amounts that we see probably did not come from oceans, but from the [carbon dioxide] atmosphere interacting directly with dust," he said... "We see so much erosion in canyons, and valleys and plains that have been stripped bare," he said. "It seems unlikely that the carbonate rocks could all be hiding out of view. When you look at the entire planet, you'd think that somewhere a little piece would be exposed."

37 posted on 12/21/2006 12:44:08 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Don't bother, I haven't updated my profile since 11/16/06. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson