Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Brightside
I wonder if the same rationale will be used in abortion cases.

You may have it pegged. This may be setting up a repeal of Roe.

127 posted on 01/17/2006 7:55:11 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35
You may have it pegged. This may be setting up a repeal of Roe.

Except for the fact that the liberal pro-abortion wing was in the majority. This decision is nonsense. If the FDA Act was constitutional, it gives the FDA power to regulate medicine. It is FDA regulation that forbids medicating people to death. Thats a legitimate regulation. If anyone thinks that the libs that decided this decision will still be on a states rights bandwagon when they hear the next abortion decision, they are dreaming.

200 posted on 01/17/2006 8:18:22 AM PST by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35

"I wonder if the same rationale will be used in abortion cases."

"You may have it pegged. This may be setting up a repeal of Roe."



The six Justices who have voted to uphold Roe (Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer) voted to uphold the Oregon law, while the three anti-Roe Justices (Scalia, Thomas and Roberts) dissented. Care to amend and modify your remarks?


643 posted on 01/17/2006 1:24:12 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (http://auh2orepublican.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson