What the Supreme Court has just ruled is that the Federal government's authority is limited, just as our Christian Founding Fathers intended. The problem lies with the State of Oregon, not the United States, which has no business telling doctors what to do. Where in the Constitution do you see the "regulate doctors" clause?
Agree 100%. If the shoe was on the other foot, you'd hear hundreds of FRino's screaming about judicial activism.
Just because we may not agree with any particular law, that does not make it the Federal Government's business.
And THAT IS WHY Roe V. Wade should have failed, not on a privacy basis, and not on a cooperative federalism 14th amendment type basis either.
LOLOLOL!
Putting the shoe on the other foot in another way...
Do the majority justices in this decision ALWAYS vote to uphold states' rights? I wonder...