Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World Social Forum slashes US anti-immigration plan
xinhuanet.com ^ | 2006-01-26 | xinhuanet.com

Posted on 01/26/2006 9:46:48 AM PST by VU4G10

CARACAS, Jan. 25 (Xinhuanet) -- Participants to the sixth World Social Forum (WSF) condemned Wednesday a U.S. proposal against undocumented immigrants, saying the plan will bring about more human rights violation.

The United States wanted to hide the fact about reduced wages of illegal immigrants by tightening border security, the participants said on the second day of the anti-globalization forum.

The anti-immigration plan will undermine human, labor and social rights, the participants added.

"It is an outrage that the United States seeks its development by stepping on the poor and less-developed nations," said Jose Nunez, Dominican representative for the Jesuit Service for Migrants and Refugees in Latin America and the Caribbean.

The U.S. House of Representatives approved the plan on Dec. 16 which would extend a frontier wall with Mexico by 1,200 km, increase the number of agents on the border, and send undocumented workers to prison instead of merely deporting them.

The plan, which is yet to be ratified by the U.S. Senate, was rejected by Latin America's governments and civil groups, which said it would increase the violent treatment of their citizens seeking to emigrate to the United States.

The annual WSF was first held in Brazil in 2001. This year's WSF is taking place in three venues -- Caracas, Karachi of Pakistan and Bamako, capital of Mali.

More than 67,000 participants registered for the six-day meeting in Caracas this year. Topics on the agenda included terrorism, media, drug trafficking, U.S. military presence in the Americas and the situation of Indians and peasants.

The African round of the event concluded Monday in Bamako, with more than 600 activities held and over 20,000 anti-globalization activists having participated. Enditem


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Mexico
KEYWORDS: aliens; commies; illegal; immigrantlist; nationalsecurity; third; world
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 01/26/2006 9:46:49 AM PST by VU4G10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

Who cares what these people think? Let them rot in their socialist cesspools of their own making, eventually the people will be tired of it and revolt.


2 posted on 01/26/2006 9:49:07 AM PST by Laz711 (The Barbarians are in Rome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

Is it just me, or is this whole response hopelessly confused in reasoning ?


3 posted on 01/26/2006 9:49:41 AM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

""It is an outrage that the United States seeks its development by stepping on the poor and less-developed nations," said Jose Nunez"

So. Just how many 'illegal immigrants' do you let in your country? Hmmmmmm?


4 posted on 01/26/2006 9:50:05 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

Though sending the employers of undocumented workers to prison would work quite well.


5 posted on 01/26/2006 9:51:21 AM PST by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laz711

I think your missing the fact that our government wants to form an AU with those nations. Our leaders care very much what they think. Those yokels down south will be helping draft our laws before long. Folks damned well better take a real interest in what they think, NOW rather than later.

As for who should care, I agree.


6 posted on 01/26/2006 9:51:38 AM PST by DoughtyOne (01/11/06: Ted Kennedy becomes the designated driver and moral spokesperson for the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
Is it just me, or is this whole response hopelessly confused in reasoning ?

It's not just you.

7 posted on 01/26/2006 9:52:09 AM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Laz711

The seeming conflict in the last sentence of my post, was meant to state what a real world working plan should be but isn't at this time. It instead seemed to conflict with the thoughts in the first paragraph.

I disagree with this rush to globalism.


8 posted on 01/26/2006 9:54:13 AM PST by DoughtyOne (01/11/06: Ted Kennedy becomes the designated driver and moral spokesperson for the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Those yokels down south will be helping draft our laws before long. Folks damned well better take a real interest in what they think, NOW rather than later.

Then they better start adding some more stars to the U.S. flag.

9 posted on 01/26/2006 9:54:45 AM PST by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

10 posted on 01/26/2006 9:55:27 AM PST by VU4G10 (Have You Forgotten?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
The anti-immigration plan will undermine human, labor and social rights, the participants added.

Well I guess your countries will just have to implement human, labor and social rights on your own, right? < crickets chirping>

11 posted on 01/26/2006 9:56:40 AM PST by KarlInOhio (During wartime, some whistles should not be blown. - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10


The third world is giving us advice? They live in filth and squalor. This would be like taking financial advice from a homeless guy.


12 posted on 01/26/2006 10:01:52 AM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

????????????????

Maybe the question should be focused as to why these people feel they need to leave their own home countries? Hmmmmm.............?


13 posted on 01/26/2006 10:02:22 AM PST by EBH (Never give-up, Never give-in, and Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
Presidente Jorge Arbusto, are you paying attention?

Do you remember your oath?


U.S. Constitution Article 4 Section 4:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,

and shall protect each of them against Invasion;"


Invasion: \In*va"sion\, n. [L. invasio: cf. F. invasion. See Invade.] [1913 Webster]

1. The act of invading; the act of encroaching upon the rights or possessions of another; encroachment; trespass.


14 posted on 01/26/2006 10:02:29 AM PST by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

Isn't this the little soiree Chavez is throwing? I don't see mention of that in the article.


15 posted on 01/26/2006 10:05:04 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

And what about my human rights as a U.S. citizen to not be burdened by heavy taxation to care for these "migrants" and to be safe in my own country. There is a much greater chance that I will be the victim of a violent crime committed by an illegal alien than a victim of a terrorist.

The elected officials that are against illegal immigration should look up the stats on violent crimes committed by illegals and use the argument relentlessly. The American public would really be surprised.


16 posted on 01/26/2006 10:05:07 AM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I disagree with the slowest crawl towards globalism.


17 posted on 01/26/2006 10:07:12 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Chinese money. Dirty Chinese money makes D.C. go round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

In other news, a conclave of kittens at the town dump voted unanimously to topple the Matterhorn.


18 posted on 01/26/2006 10:11:33 AM PST by oblomov (Join the FR Folding@Home Team (#36120) keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
The World Social Forum is Cindy Sheehan's new organization. It is suppose to compete with the WTF.

The whole deal is laughable. Go to the FR thread: Cindy Sheehan detested by Venezuelans for more laughs.

Cindy is having a tough time finding friends!

19 posted on 01/26/2006 10:34:31 AM PST by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moehoward
>>>Isn't this the little soiree Chavez is throwing? <<<

Yes! Go to FR thread: Cindy Sheehan detested by Venezuelans for some laughs and to find out about the WSF.....Cindy's new organization.

20 posted on 01/26/2006 10:38:43 AM PST by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson