To: genefromjersey
It's been time for the 'greenhouse gang' to pack it in for a long time.
But liberals love power, and the power to put increasing complex demands on businesses and the populace is something they do not want to give up.
I say it's high time that we dismantled the EPA, and a whole host of other alphabets.
2 posted on
01/26/2006 1:25:53 PM PST by
Kidan
(Tolerance is the virtue of a man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
To: genefromjersey
Hmmm. You found several things I'd completely missed. Thanks!
3 posted on
01/26/2006 1:26:41 PM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: genefromjersey
4 posted on
01/26/2006 1:32:04 PM PST by
tx_eggman
(Unforgiveness is like eating rat poison and expecting the other person to get sick.)
To: genefromjersey
Last year, according to the January 14,2006 of “New Scientist” magazine, environmental engineer Frank Keppler, and his colleagues at the Max Planck Institute discovered that living plants emit a significant portion – 10% to 30 % ,depending on the season – of the methane –a more serious greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide- that makes its way into the atmosphere. Ronald Reagan said this same thing years ago.
5 posted on
01/26/2006 1:34:56 PM PST by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: genefromjersey
7 posted on
01/26/2006 1:59:48 PM PST by
mugs99
(Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
To: genefromjersey
As Europe struggles with another week of sub-zero temperatures-
Emitting heat on the order of a continuous nuclear explosion,this plume may be one of the primary forces behind global warming.
I agree that they Kyoto protocol is nothing more than hot air, but this author seems to be speaking from both sides of the issue.
The first statement above which I'm quoting seems to argue against global warming and for global cooling. Then, the second statement presents a heretofre unmentioned force which may be causing global warming. Which is it?
9 posted on
01/26/2006 2:32:52 PM PST by
adorno
To: genefromjersey
Most of the global warming hypothesis is based upon simulation of the atmosphere. Simulation can become a self-fulfilling process. When on sets out to simulate a process, one tends to put things in the model that are consistent with the theory behind the process. If you believe that global warming exists you model the theories that support the process. If you believe carbon dioxide causes global warming, you put equations in that correleate warming to carbon dioxide and you get global warming.
As a most wise man once said: "Simulation is like masturbation. You do it enough and you begin to think it's better than the real thing."
13 posted on
01/27/2006 5:00:02 AM PST by
DugwayDuke
(Stupidity can be a self-correcting problem.)
15 posted on
06/03/2006 4:34:32 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson