[hoosierham]

Another poster speaks of the wonderful job President Bush is doing in the WOT.

I may be stupid but not securing your nation's borders while hassling its citizens seems a darn poor way to go about it.

The main thrust of the WOT resembles the WOD and that is a WOF/WOR.

Bush has called the Americans brave enough to do something vigilantes while ,by not budgeting the 1800 Border Patrol positions, he resists the will of the people and Congress.

He said he would sign a extension of the AWB,only good conservative Congressmen responded to the Constitution and the people and voted it down.

He has vetoed nothing.

He has expanded the federal government and the debt.

He has launched a questionable war and asked the troops to fight under restrictions and not mobilized the nation to do the job and be done with it.

He has been a great disappointment.

Yet he was apparently the better of the two.

You would think we could find some other than a ski bum who married for money vs. daddy's little rich boy who failed in a couple of business.

Heck,maybe Bill Gates SHOULD be President since he is a bigger success.

[Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin]

Yeah. Those folks in D.C. aren't the slightest bit interested in securing our borders. If they were, it would have been done years ago. Another freeper said Bush and all them folks just believe in "World Peace," while apparently being quite loyal to the U.S. That's probably part of it, but more likely it's just a handy-dandy excuse to continue being the do-nothing, money-changers that corrupt human nature ascribes.

[Eastbound]

"You would think we could find some other than a ski bum who married for money vs. daddy's little rich boy who failed in a couple of business."

But what will he do to save the Union?

What will congress do to save the Union this time around?

Well, they didn't really save it after all, did they? They only re-structured it -- and they will re-structure it again.

Will they re-write the Constitution again, add Amendment 14-A, granting illegals all the privileges and immunities of 14th Amendment citizens?

Seems to me amnesty and acceptance of illegals in any form and open borders is a de -facto alteration of Amendment 14 without benefit of legitimate passage.

Maybe it will avert a civil war. Right? Too bad we have to act from a position of weakness. When was the last time we acted from a position of strength and resolve? I forget.

Muzzies getting the path well-paved by others.