Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The British Are Much Healthier Than The Americans
medical news today ^ | 03 May 2006 | Christian Nordqvist

Posted on 05/03/2006 11:36:51 PM PDT by demlosers

The British Are Much Healthier Than The Americans

A large study, which looked at the health of middle class, middle-aged, white residents in both the USA and Britain found that the British enjoy much better health than their American counterparts. Even though the USA has a much higher income per capita than the UK, about 25% higher, the British are far ahead when it comes to the health of its residents.

Americans also spend a great deal more on health care than the British do. The average expenditure per head per year on health in the UK is $2,164, while in the USA it stands at $5,274.

You can read about this study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), May 3 Issue.

Even when obesity, drinking, smoking and social levels are taken into account, the difference between the two nations is significant.

Here are some figures showing the incidence of some diseases:

Diabetes USA - 12.5% UK - 6.1%

High Blood Pressure USA - 42.4% UK - 33.8%

Heart Disease USA - 15.1% UK - 9.6%

Cancer USA - 9.5% UK - 5.5%

Lung Disease USA - 8.1% UK - 6.3%

Stroke USA - 3.8% UK - 2.3%

Heart Attack USA - 5.5% UK - 4%

The study looked at the health of 6,400 Americans and 9,300 British people aged 40-70.

The researchers also found that in many aspects of health the UK people at the lower end of the social scale enjoyed better health than the Americans at the top end. Heart disease in Britain's lowest group stood at 11.6%, while for the highest American group it was 12%.

The researchers are not sure what the reason(s) for this disparity may be. There are many factors which could be responsible. Here is a list:

-- Britain has a universal health care system which is free for everyone. The USA has a patchwork of public and private healthcare. However, this study looked at well-off white residents - in both countries, all the people studied had good access to health care.

-- The USA has a bigger obesity/overweight problem than the UK does. The obesity/overweight problem has been present in the USA for longer than in the UK.

-- The British are more physically active than the Americans. People walk and cycle more in Britain than in America. The British also use public transport more.

-- Americans eat more junk food than the British do.

-- American food portions are much bigger than British ones. American portions are three times the size of a portion in the 1970s.

-- Americans are not addressing the underlying problems of obesity as much as the British are. Americans are treating the symptoms of obesity, rather than the reasons for it. However, it must be pointed out that the British are getting fatter and people complain not enough is being done to address the reasons for rising obesity levels in Britain.

-- Americans suffer from higher levels of stress than the British do.

If all the British have access to free health care, which is not the case in America, one wonders what the health disparities would be if all sectors of society in both countries were studied and compared.

Britain does not enjoy better levels of health when compared to many of its European neighbours.

Written by: Christian Nordqvist Editor: Medical News Today


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: health
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 05/03/2006 11:36:53 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demlosers

US standard of living is 25 percent higher.

US doesn't have a socialized medical community which preserves itself by denial of service.

Oh, you don't have a problem.

Compare average age at death.


2 posted on 05/03/2006 11:38:28 PM PDT by Donald Meaker (The MG-42 has a rate of fire of 1300 rounds per minute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donald Meaker

The gum disease called GIN-GI-VI-TIS USA - 6% UK - 93.2%


3 posted on 05/03/2006 11:42:02 PM PDT by Zeppelin (Texas Longhorns === National Champions !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Donald Meaker

We eat poorly and don't exercise, plain and simple. We indulge in things we shouldn't, we get fat and lazy.

But there's no reason the government should intervene.


4 posted on 05/03/2006 11:42:24 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Donald Meaker

UK
total population: 78.54 years
male: 76.09 years
female: 81.13 years (2006 est.)

US
total population: 77.85 years
male: 75.02 years
female: 80.82 years (2006 est.)

Doesnt appear significant difference to me. Women: less than a year difference. Men about a year. not a big deal.


5 posted on 05/03/2006 11:42:39 PM PDT by Donald Meaker (The MG-42 has a rate of fire of 1300 rounds per minute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Rparr28922

I just clicked your link, "mate." You're from Pennsylvania ya phony! =P


8 posted on 05/03/2006 11:46:46 PM PDT by Zeppelin (Texas Longhorns === National Champions !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
At first glance it looks like the author is a cheerleader for socialism. I'll check out the report and comment more then...
9 posted on 05/03/2006 11:46:58 PM PDT by Jaysun (Even with a paddle, shit creek ain't no picnic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
The problem with this study is that they compared USA government generated statistics with Brit government generated statistics --this means that both sets of numbers are totally unreliable.
10 posted on 05/03/2006 11:49:55 PM PDT by Aussiebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: demlosers
Are the definitions for high blood pressure and diabetes (among other things) the same in both countries?

There are likely biases going on in opposite directions for both countries.

In America there's an incentive for doctors to find something wrong with you - real or imagined - and to prescribe something for it. The wealthier you are the less you care if you "really" need it or not.

In government run health care just the opposite is true. You have to really need - and may well more than need - treatment and or medication in order for the government to make the expenditure to do something about it.

With such different systems, I find it hard to believe that the collected numbers mean all that much.

Life expectancy would seem to be a better measure as there are fewer biases of what life and death mean...

How do those numbers compare? And you should really only compare actual death rates due to health issues, not crime generated.
12 posted on 05/03/2006 11:55:40 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB
On the other hand, beside apples and oranges on the statistics, perhaps people who live in a dreadful climate with rain, high humidity and cold weather are healthier than people who live in a reasonable climate?
13 posted on 05/03/2006 11:59:51 PM PDT by Aussiebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rparr28922
trying my hand at British humor.

I didn't know there was such a thing.
14 posted on 05/04/2006 12:00:04 AM PDT by Jaysun (Even with a paddle, shit creek ain't no picnic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rparr28922

well, chap, Aussies use "mate". =P


15 posted on 05/04/2006 12:00:19 AM PDT by Zeppelin (Texas Longhorns === National Champions !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Aussiebabe

Maybe they're better preserved because they are well chilled.


16 posted on 05/04/2006 12:01:24 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Donald Meaker

Thanks.

Those numbers should be adjusted for both crime related deaths and illegal aliens giving birth to poor health children that don't make it.

Our infant mortality rates are definitely skewed because of poor illegals giving birth here without ever seeing a doctor.

Then it would be closer to apples to apples...


17 posted on 05/04/2006 12:04:20 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy

Good point, "mate"!


18 posted on 05/04/2006 12:07:27 AM PDT by Aussiebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Aussiebabe

Could be. Don't know.


19 posted on 05/04/2006 12:07:28 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

There is a bias in the way the list was generated. The list was based on "self-reported illnesses." No one checked to see if what was reported was actually true. Perhaps Americans are simply more "health conscious" and reported themselves as having ailments that the British would shrug off, or had something that was treated under the American system that the NHS denied even existed.


20 posted on 05/04/2006 12:16:53 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson