Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blanco vetoes natural gas port
nola.com ^ | 05/06/06 | Pam Radtke Russell

Posted on 05/06/2006 6:04:36 AM PDT by Ellesu

Fears for fisheries take front seat over possible economic benefits :

Placing the state's environment over its economy, Gov. Kathleen Blanco on Friday night vetoed a proposed billion-dollar liquefied natural gas port off Louisiana's coast because of the impact it might have on the state's fisheries.

The Main Pass Energy Hub, proposed by New Orleans-based Freeport McMoRan Energy LLC, would have been about 16 miles off Louisiana's coast and would have supplied about 350 billion cubic feet of natural gas a year, enough to supply a state the size of Mississippi for a year. But the jobs and natural gas the port would have brought into the state were apparently outweighed by concerns that the port could kill billions of fish eggs and larvae as it sucked in seawater to reheat the supercooled gas.

"As stewards of the public trust, this office and our state agencies and executive departments, have both a constitutional and a statutory duty to preserve and protect Louisiana's coastal and offshore marine environment, ecosystem, and fisheries for the benefit of our current and future citizens. The approval of the pending license application, without sufficient persuasive data in support, would be inconsistent with this public trust doctrine," Blanco wrote in her letter of opposition to the federal Maritime Administration.

Blanco's opposition to the project means that the project as designed is dead. Blanco had until Monday to support or oppose the port. The Maritime Administration provides permits for the ports.

(Excerpt) Read more at nola.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: blanco; energy; environmentalists; lng; wedontneedjobs; wedontneedmoney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 05/06/2006 6:04:42 AM PDT by Ellesu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LA Woman3
Freeport has said that Main Pass' annual economic impact would be $85.6 million, and that it would produce as many as 900 jobs during a three-year design and construction period.


Good to know Louisiana can afford to be so picky.
2 posted on 05/06/2006 6:06:24 AM PDT by Ellesu (www.thedeadpelican.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
Yet another reason why Louisiana will take decades to recover while states like Mississippi and Texas that also had Hurricane damage last year will be years ahead.
3 posted on 05/06/2006 6:08:23 AM PDT by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Methinks Mississippi or Texas will jump on this project with both feet.


4 posted on 05/06/2006 6:09:08 AM PDT by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan
And you KNOW the gas terminal will now be built off the coast of Texas--probably near Houston.
5 posted on 05/06/2006 6:10:21 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
. But the jobs and natural gas the port would have brought into the state were apparently outweighed by concerns that the port could kill billions of fish eggs and larvae as it sucked in seawater to reheat the supercooled gas

Verses the billions of tons of garbage and raw sewage that was swept into the gulf after Katrina? Sorry but I'll be staying away from any Gulf fish for awhile!


6 posted on 05/06/2006 6:10:51 AM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Real reason: they didn't pay enough bribes to the right people.


7 posted on 05/06/2006 6:11:11 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Another nail in her coffin.


8 posted on 05/06/2006 6:12:34 AM PDT by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

This from the state that has the city that "makes it's own gravy" ????


9 posted on 05/06/2006 6:12:51 AM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

What would the economic impact be to the fishing communities though? I suspect less than $85 million, but environmental concerns aside, the fishing community out here isn't chopped liver. Louisiana's culture is strongly tied to seafood. Kill off the fisheries, and you kill the culture.


10 posted on 05/06/2006 6:13:55 AM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan

Both MS, TX and AL are miles ahead of LA. As long as LA has the likes of Kathleen Blanco, Mary Landrieu, William Jefferson (Criminal Black Racist Democrat), Ray Nagin and the Confressional Black Caucus, etc. calling the shots of redevelopment and economic recovery, they will be going nowhere. Can you imagine, that this "Democrat Witch Governor" vetoed the natural gas port bill. Aw shucks, don't blame Blanco, blame the idiots that reside in Louisiana. As I said, NOLA & LA are going nowhere!!!!


11 posted on 05/06/2006 6:15:06 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Why locate another energy complex off the Gulf Coast, where hurricanes hit every year? It ought to be off the Atlantic coast, where people use the most natural gas for heating. If they don't allow it, they don't need to be warm in winter. Let them admire the seabirds and forget how cold they are.


12 posted on 05/06/2006 6:16:43 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

Freeport had sought to mitigate concerns about open loop technology by minimizing the amount of water taken in, the depth at which the water would be taken and by screening out the amount of sealife that might be sucked into the system.

Also, they pledged to shut down the Main Pass terminal if there were no way to avoid or mitigate the deaths of redfish, shrimp, tuna or other species.

This week, the Environmental Protection Agency approved the project with Freeport's changes and recommended a few minor modifications. Last month, the Coast Guard, which conducted an environmental review of Main Pass, said the marine impacts would be moderate to minor. The project was supported by Louisiana industries, especially chemical plants, which said that cheap natural gas is necessary to keep their plants operating.


13 posted on 05/06/2006 6:17:35 AM PDT by Ellesu (www.thedeadpelican.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

I found this guy pushing the issue

http://timrileylaw.com/LNG_NEWS.htm


14 posted on 05/06/2006 6:19:24 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka

no, the raal reason is to blackmail the feds into even more billions post Katrina. I hope "Jim Bob" Moffett (CEO of Freeport McMOran) moves his headquarters out of NOLA and back to his home state of Texas.


15 posted on 05/06/2006 6:19:58 AM PDT by fatrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
"Let them admire the seabirds and forget how cold they are."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.......
Naw it's big oils fault, why are they not building more refineries and gas terminals?? congress is investigating the lack of supply in the USA..will this example of GOV stopping supply be used..bet not a word will be spoken of the action, as is does not support the big oil formula of whats wrong with our energy supply..what idiots we elect.
16 posted on 05/06/2006 6:22:24 AM PDT by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Why locate another energy complex off the Gulf Coast

Because that is where the most pipelines for distribution through the nation already exist.


17 posted on 05/06/2006 6:24:22 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
This from the state that has the city that "makes it's own gravy"

Just not the kind you want to sop up with a biscuit....

18 posted on 05/06/2006 6:30:55 AM PDT by Thermalseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
Gov. Kathleen Blanco on Friday night vetoed a proposed billion-dollar liquefied natural gas port off Louisiana's coast because of the impact it might have on the state's fisheries.

I am so sick of seeing the word MIGHT whenever environazis try to prevent energy production. It's always this MIGHT impact the fishies, that MIGHT effect the camel-toed carribou, etc... These idiots are so full of dire warnings whenever it comes to any kind of development but can never actually prove that anything bad will actually happen. This ain't the first natural gas port on an ocean front. Surely we can find out what happened at previous ones, and if something needs to be done better then changes can be made accordingly.

19 posted on 05/06/2006 6:31:56 AM PDT by EricT. (CA conservatives only serve to inflate the number of electoral votes won by the Dems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
The Dems simply want to cut us off of ANY fuel supplies... other than the ones that haven't been invented.

They've calculated they cannot build from the sysem we have if they regain power. They feel they must destroy it first... using its rubble as fertilizer to build their progressive, socialist utopia.

20 posted on 05/06/2006 6:34:22 AM PDT by johnny7 (“Nah, I ain’t Jewish, I just don’t dig on swine, that’s all.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson