This is a great title. The National Review Editorial Board described the North Korean missile test perfectly.
To: sukhoi-30mki; Oztrich Boy; Tommyjo; dervish; familyop; Gengis Khan; CarrotAndStick
2 posted on
07/06/2006 10:29:13 PM PDT by
garbageseeker
(It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
To: garbageseeker
Send him over the edge. The more hysterical he gets, the more stupid and un-tactical he'll be. And the more stupid...less threat.
3 posted on
07/06/2006 10:38:25 PM PDT by
familyop
("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists." --President Bush)
To: garbageseeker
Since the Taepodong-2 missile failed horribly, and Kim Jong II may think he has lost face, will he become angry and pull a 'I'll show them' and do something stupid?
5 posted on
07/06/2006 10:43:17 PM PDT by
Greystoke
To: garbageseeker
awwww,... does widdle Kimmy have MD (Missile Dysfunction), PD (Premature Detonation)????
8 posted on
07/06/2006 10:47:26 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: garbageseeker
Ummmm ....wait, fellas:
I was a bad boy...listening to NPR...and they had a couple "experts" on...from the usual list of commie think tanks....and their universal reaction is, "the threat from NK missiles has been HYPED to sell SDI. Time to CUT CUT CUT the program to SPEND SPEND SPEND on the poor", etc.
It'll be a Dem plank fer sherrrr.
Kim might be a step ahead, demonstrating ostensible failure, to ratchet up opposition to anti missile defense, etc. Dialecticus Maximus.
10 posted on
07/06/2006 10:55:59 PM PDT by
dasboot
To: garbageseeker
I don't see how this isn't a gigantic embarrassment for Kim. Its 2006, not 1936. Missle technology is well known and has been for decades. Its not like North Korea was trying to do something that had never been done before.
To: garbageseeker
20 posted on
07/07/2006 5:55:22 AM PDT by
BaBaStooey
(I heart Emma Caulfield.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
