Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ma ja99

I must say that while I find the much of the WH strategy for the 2006 elections generally mysterious, this speech is particularly bizarre - I find it hard to believe it's going to attract "moderate Republican" and independent votes, as as is obvious from comments here it infuriates much of the "base". Rove is supposed to be a master tactician, from the WH perspective why not just let the issue slide until after the election, instead of essentially declaring war with as powerful faction of his own party?

No one is closer the President, it's hard it's believe Rove is a loose cannon on this issue...is it possible that the President, who we know tends to take opposition very personality and occasional see it as “disloyalty”, is personalizing his disagreements with congressional Republicans on this one.

If so, I can't see see anything by trouble ahead.


183 posted on 07/11/2006 6:31:49 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros at the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: M. Dodge Thomas
Rove is supposed to be a master tactician, from the WH perspective why not just let the issue slide until after the election, instead of essentially declaring war with as powerful faction of his own party?

One of Rove's crowning achievements was--and liberals will admit this--getting President Bush reelected in 2004 against Walter Mondale cum tan-in-a-can, John Kerry.

Genius? I would have to question that.
200 posted on 07/11/2006 6:37:39 PM PDT by Das Outsider (FRiday nights, get your "Perspective.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson