Posted on 09/06/2006 7:45:51 AM PDT by Vasilli22
The possibility does not prove the actuality.
You could smell the jet fuel that day all the way up on Columbia Pike. I still get furious every time I drive by there.
I suppose Bush was giving money to families of suicide bombers, funding the Hezbo's, secretly providing Iran with uranium enrichment technology, etc.
I wonder if Bush and the neo-cons are responsible for all the terrorist attacks in the 90's? How big is this conspiracy?
One other thing: if this is a Bush conspiracy, why weren't WMD's conveniently located shortly after the invasion into Iraq?
I can't believe that a conspiracy this well planned would overlook that little detail.
This idiotic "theory," which is so stupid that only professors - or the French - could fall for it, is the basis for a new movie that has just screened at the Venice Film Festival. "A Few Days in September" stars Juliette Binoche as a French spy trying to protect the children of her ex-partner, a US government operative (Nick Nolte) with inside knowledge of the 9/11 plan.
This risible tripe was greeted with great applause from the America-haters at the festival. My hisses and boos were quite overwhelmed.
We soldier on. Yes, we will once more be called upon to save Europe. But is Europe worth saving?
Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe ...
But leading scientists say ...
Riiight.--Apparently these claims do not come from just ordinary nutjobs. They are the leading, top rated nutjobs in the land.
Agreed. If you want the US to fight the savages trying to tear Western Civilization down, vote Republican. If you want us to surrender, vote Democrat.
All academic eggheads like these guys THINK they are leading experts in whatever field of study they are polluting.
Actually CSPAN broadcast their recent conference. None of them are muslim that I could see. At first they sound like a bunch of far left democrat nut cases ... but then, at the end of the conf, Alex Jones, the leader, said the leadership of the Demonrats was even more responsible for 9-11 than Bush...
that comment didn't get the thunderous applause many of the other comments did...
Read: "delusional."
And who can forget all the rejoicing that went on in towel-headland when the towers fell?
Do these nutcases think their revered Bill Clinton was in on it because he was calling OBL dangerous in the 90s?
The profs think the use of box cutters is technology beyond the capability of knuckle dragging jihadists?
kooks
Don't have a clue regarding what made WTC-7 fall. I have gone and relooked at the tape, and Dan Rather is talking about how it looks just like a demolition job as it falls....
I'm looking forward to the Jan report by the NIST - it will go a long way to stopping this caturwalling....
They will probably say that since the Twin Towers were built in the late 60s and early 70s, Nixon had the charges planted there, for future use. They're that crazy!
I wouldn't mind seeing more treason investigations and prosecutions. That's very easy to say, since there have been NONE that I am aware of.
I had heard that the planes were built to withstand the impact of the biggest planes of the day, but that the effect of a fully-loaded jet's gas tank exploding was not forseen. That may or may not be true. Then again, I don't know of many buildings that could withstand that.
according to a group of leading academics.
Um, yeah sure if they say so.
What's even scarier is that it might be true, which is a commentary on the state of academe.
Considering the fact that professors need to deal in facts and reality, not even tenure should save these pampered idiots from being fired as they have ZERO grasp on the real world.
Don't forget, it's also "leading academics" and "scientists" who consistently push global warming.
"leading academic" = idiot!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.