Don't have a clue regarding what made WTC-7 fall. I have gone and relooked at the tape, and Dan Rather is talking about how it looks just like a demolition job as it falls....
I'm looking forward to the Jan report by the NIST - it will go a long way to stopping this caturwalling....
Yes, should be an interesting report. All I can say is, given what little I know, a massive explosion and all that damage so very close by seems much, much more likely than a "plot" no one has any evidence for.
It won't do a thing about it. Even if these kooks had been at the WTC site and watched the planes hit in person, they'd still claim that Bush had the buildings blown up and that what they had just seen was some kind of illusion manufactured by Rove and Cheney. There's no point in even trying to reason with these people.
Actually, if the Dims win the House or Senate in November, I would expect the caterwauling by these kooks to increase exponentially, as they would go all out to demand investigations into Bush's role in 9/11. The scary part is, I could see the Dims actually opening such an inquiry.
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc_062907.html
Well, I guess we’re still waiting. However I did find the phrase ‘hypothetical blast’ and the context in which it was used in the above quite interesting.