To: blam
Odd, that they are still arguing about bones, instead of DNA.
11 posted on
09/08/2006 8:00:54 PM PDT by
patton
(Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
To: patton
[Odd, that they are still arguing about bones, instead of DNA.]
Arguing about DNA would blow the lid off evolution propaganda. I have been waiting for the anthropologists and evolutionists to explain why they have yet to find any remains of the transitional species they always put forward. Perhaps there is no transitional species since every one they have put forward to be one has been a fraud. Evolution is the religion of the deluded and they have less scientific proof yet they continue to teach the young people junk science and lies.
Good point about the DNA versus bones.
16 posted on
09/08/2006 8:09:48 PM PDT by
ohhhh
(...every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.)
To: patton
If they don't have any Neanderthal DNA, it has to be bones.
27 posted on
09/08/2006 8:33:12 PM PDT by
expatpat
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson