I hadn't seen this posted on here (did the search for it too and didn't find it) so I figured I would post it, sorry is someone had posted it anyway.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Gribbles141
No not forgery. /sarcasm
2 posted on
10/05/2006 6:34:44 PM PDT by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
To: Gribbles141
Bumpus Maximus...oh yeah, emails have been forwarded around, recopied and re-emailed to make them look like actual emails from long ago.
Then faxed to make them look more realistic....
This whole thing stinks.
3 posted on
10/05/2006 6:37:39 PM PDT by
GRRRRR
(Love America? Protect Her, VOTE GOP...they're better than nothing.)
To: Gribbles141
Men in pj's strike again.
4 posted on
10/05/2006 6:38:29 PM PDT by
TASMANIANRED
(The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
To: Gribbles141
(Stewie Griffin's voice) "Damn you red X's!"
To: Gribbles141
check the spacing in the first email after "TO" and the second email...those are TWO DIFFERENT EMAILS!! from two different accounts. Those fields are autoformated in Outlook.
6 posted on
10/05/2006 6:40:02 PM PDT by
GRRRRR
(Love America? Protect Her, VOTE GOP...they're better than nothing.)
To: Gribbles141
Nobody actually has copies of the IM's...reportedly...other than ABC (isn't that just convienient of ABC).
So other outlets are just typing them from what they have had come across the line. Which could leave to the discrepency.
The biggest question should be WHY IS IT...that right after ABC and the Dems get busted by a tip to the Drudge Report that a set of the IMs that ABC has been putting outh there was passed out as a pranks (Foley fell for the prank and should be gone, no matter what) and that THEY FELL INTO THE HANDS OF DEM OPERATIVES.
Which means ABC and Democrats are busted as actually being the ones who KNEW WHAT WHEN (meaning they were the ones who had access to the IMs) and sat on the IM's instead of going to the authorities. MEANING...they played politics with the safety of kids.
MEANING...it was Democrats who covered this issue up...not Republicans.
To: Gribbles141
I am waiting for AOL's security to verify the emails.
Won't happen unless it goes to trial.
I was a juror on a kiddie porn trial and listened to AOL's security chief explain just how they knew so sent what to whom.
8 posted on
10/05/2006 6:40:37 PM PDT by
razorback-bert
(I met Bill Clinton once but he didn’t really talk — he was hitting on my wife)
To: Gribbles141
"Fake but Queer"?
11 posted on
10/05/2006 6:43:53 PM PDT by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: pinz-n-needlez; onyx; ohioWfan; Texasforever; BigSkyFreeper; Tamzee; mrs tiggywinkle; Dog; ...
15 posted on
10/05/2006 6:47:37 PM PDT by
Mo1
(SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - BECOME A MONTHLY DONOR)
To: Gribbles141
We officially have "Rathergate The Sequel".
16 posted on
10/05/2006 6:48:03 PM PDT by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: Gribbles141
It also looks like there are FOUR dots after the word "break" on one version and only three dots on the other.
Anyone else see this?
18 posted on
10/05/2006 6:48:49 PM PDT by
HighWheeler
(def.- Democrats: n. from Greek; “democ” - many; “rats” - ugly, filthy, bloodsucking parasites.)
To: Gribbles141
Was this the October surprise that Karl Rove was talking about? (To make the Dems and the MSM look even dumber than Inspector Clouseau?)
To: Gribbles141
HA ha...
and the RATS take another one in the...
21 posted on
10/05/2006 6:49:07 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: Gribbles141
25 posted on
10/05/2006 6:49:52 PM PDT by
txrangerette
("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!b)
To: Gribbles141
This whole deal is starting to evolve from the frightening to the annoying.
This sure looks like another fake but accurate story. If they can't identify the provenance of the emails, there is no case.
27 posted on
10/05/2006 6:51:26 PM PDT by
TexanToTheCore
(This space for hire...)
To: Gribbles141
Whoa. Wait a minute. Are you saying that most everything that ABSmears Brian Ross reported isn't true?
/s
To: Gribbles141
What happens if the DoJ decides that ABC is an adjunct of the dem party and comes under campaign finance laws?
Or comes under any number of FTC rulings on fair practices?
Subject to license revocation.
34 posted on
10/05/2006 6:55:17 PM PDT by
Prost1
(Fair and Unbiased as always!)
To: Gribbles141
I hadn't seen it posted here, but I did see that somewhere. I think it was raw story or hot air. The emails from the fake blog and the ones at ABC don't match! And they haven't for about two weeks! This isn't news anywmore.
Maybe it's just me, but Bill seems to be a little too fame hungry. Why again is this being dragged out if both people who were involved have resigned?
I'm sorry, that's mean. Maybe I'm just cranky from being barfed on twice today, lol.
To: Gribbles141
The IMs were a prank and the E-Mail is a fake so what's left other than he said, he said?
43 posted on
10/05/2006 7:00:01 PM PDT by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: Gribbles141
REPORT:
STASH OF FOLEY EMAILS FOUND IN PAKISTAN
dateline ...Islamabad
Approximately 450 emails and instant messages from disgraced Republican Congressman Mark Foley to young male Pages have been discovered in a safe house outside of the capital of Pakistan."We have yet to fully review the contents but it looks sick, sick, sick." said Mohammed W. Zaki ....
Developing
50 posted on
10/05/2006 7:06:03 PM PDT by
woofie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson