'If Michael Moore pulled this kind of thing--- taking people out of context and misrepresenting himself in order to manipulate them in order to make him rich--- which is essentially what Moore does do in "Roger and Me" and his other movies-- then people (at least conservatives) wouldn't be so easy on him."
One is a spoof and a comedy and the other claims to be a documentary. Why not compare night and day? Compare it to a Scary Movie or an Airplane spoof and you'd be spot on. By all accounts a funny movie and I will always err on the side of anything that is not pc.
The difference is that this is supposed to be a comedy. Micheal Moore presents his works as "informative" and non-fiction. It's his hypocrisy and spin that are offensive. If he was making comedies, then I doubt conservatives would complain.
The difference is that this is supposed to be a comedy. Micheal Moore presents his works as "informative" and non-fiction. It's his hypocrisy and spin that are offensive. If he was making comedies, then I doubt conservatives would complain.
i AGREE WITH YOU...WELL SAID. I REALLY DON'T WANT TO SEE THIS.
I don't think putting a sex toy on soemone's stump arm is funny. "borat" is despicable. If you want to do this why not just give the villagers money?
I think the producers should now go back to every villager and give them each $10k if they acted in the mvoe and the village a couple hundred thousand...that might be a beginning.
I won't see the movie, I think it's juvenile and cruel, and it certainly doesn't help our relationship with Khazakstan.