Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Specter says Bush must nominate moderate judges
Jurist Legal News and Research ^ | November 13, 2006 | Jaime Jansen

Posted on 11/27/2006 4:17:49 PM PST by bd476

[JURIST] US Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) [official website; JURIST news archive], outgoing chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee [official website], has indicated that President Bush may have to nominate moderate judges to any future vacancies on the US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] following midterm elections that ceded control of Congress to the Democrats. Monday's Philadelphia Inquirer also quoted Specter as speculating that the Democrats, who formally take control in January, may restrict or even halt judicial confirmations until the 2008 presidential elections.

In related comments, Specter expressed hope that the lame-duck Congress will push through legislation [JURIST report] authorizing domestic surveillance [JURIST news archive] of suspected terrorists. Last week, Bush urged lawmakers [transcript] to pass the Terrorist Surveillance Act, which he called an "important priority in the war on terror."

The House version of the bill, which was passed in September [JURIST report], would allow warrantless surveillance for fixed periods following an "armed attack" or a "terrorist attack," or if the president perceives an "imminent threat of attack," with indefinite extensions pending congressional and court oversight.

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) [official website; JURIST news archive], who is expected to take over as Judiciary Committee chairman, has said that any legislation passed authorizing domestic surveillance of terrorists must contain "adequate checks and balances."



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arlenspecter; bush; judges; judiciary; liberal; rino; specter; sphincter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: bd476

The object at this point may not be to nominate anyone if a liberal judge quits or dies, it just means one less obstructionist justice.


61 posted on 11/27/2006 5:43:44 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Dane -

Aren't you gonna blame Tom Cancredo for this? You love to blame him for everything. Yeah, it's all Tom's fault.
62 posted on 11/27/2006 5:46:58 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bd476
Bush has been appointing moderate Judges from the get go. Maybe not moderate in the vernacular of liberal extremists such as Specter and his Radical dimocrat comrades, but moderate in the dictionary sense of the word.

Moderate Judges in the true sense of the word, are strict Constitutionalists, fully aware that their duty is to interpret the law as it is clearly defined in the Constitution, not to rewrite it.

The only extremist Judges I see, are those who look to decisions by foreign courts, for guidance in making their rulings, while disdaining or ignoring the US Constitution. Such extremist Judges that gave us us, abortion on demand, that has been used as birth control by the irresponsible to the tune of 50 million dead babies, God out of schools, the legalization of sodomy, homosexual sex education for first graders,abortion on a minor with parental knowledge or permission and many, many more, Judicially ordained atrocities against morality, rationality and American families.
63 posted on 11/27/2006 5:50:16 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (We'll stop calling you liberals,liberals, as soon as we find a title that pisses you off more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

With=Without.


64 posted on 11/27/2006 6:00:22 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (We'll stop calling you liberals,liberals, as soon as we find a title that pisses you off more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
Have you heard about the liberal Democrat Michigan Court of Appeals Judge who was nominated (by President Bush) to the Federal Court Western District?

Newly elected Democrat Senator Debbie Stabenow (Michigan) accepted campaign funds from the Judge's liberal Democrat Labor Attorney husband.

Senator Stabenow is now threatening to continue the logjam in the judicial nomination process if her friend, the liberal Democrat Judge is not appointed to the Federal Court.

Senator Sam Brownback, (R Kansas) became concerned when it was revealed that the liberal Judge nominee presided over/attended a gay wedding in 2002. Thus far, Senator Brownback appears to be the only Senator who is trying to block the liberal Judge's appointment to the higher Court.

Senator Specter wants the liberal Judge approved, now.

(Democrat) Senator hits back on judges (Liberal Democrat Judge Nomination)


65 posted on 11/27/2006 6:04:17 PM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: NickFlooding
NickFlooding wrote: "I have a better idea. How about PA electing more conservatives and fewer RINO's."

That's a great idea, Nick.

66 posted on 11/27/2006 6:11:41 PM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: bd476

No I hadn't heard of this. Thanks for the enlightenment.

I stand corrected, appreciative and humble.


67 posted on 11/27/2006 6:16:52 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (We'll stop calling you liberals,liberals, as soon as we find a title that pisses you off more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
F.J. Mitchell wrote: "No I hadn't heard of this. Thanks for the enlightenment. I stand corrected, appreciative and humble."

You're welcome F.J. However it wasn't my intention to correct you as much as to pass along the information I found today, including the $1,750 in campaign contributions Judge Neff's husband gave to Senator Debbie Stabenow's campaign.

68 posted on 11/27/2006 6:22:34 PM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Prince Caspian
"I know your works; I know that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either cold or hot. So because you are lukewarm, neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth."
- - Revelations 3:14, The New American Bible, Saint Joseph Edition

(By the way, the literal translation is actually "vomit", not "spit".)

69 posted on 11/27/2006 6:24:55 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
Sloth wrote: "In Media-speak / Specterese, 'moderate' = liberal."

One openly liberal Democrat Michigan Appeals Court Judge, has been nominated and is waiting for appointment to the Western District Federal Court. Senator Specter wants Judge Janet T. Neff approved immediately.

One Republican Senator, Sam Brownback (Kansas) wants the nomination blocked. Some do not approve of Senator Brownback's reason to block the nomination - the Judge presided over/attended a gay wedding in 2002.

The most outspoken supporter of the Judge's appointment to the Federal Bench is Senator Debbie Stabenow (Democrat Michigan). Stabenow accepted $1,750 in Senate campaign contributions from the Judge's Labor Attorney husband and is now threatening to continue the logjam in the judicial nomination process if the Judge's appointment doesn't go through.

(Democrat) Senator hits back on judges (Liberal Democrat Judge Nomination)

70 posted on 11/27/2006 6:58:29 PM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo; Slings and Arrows

Well, the cat looks happy....


71 posted on 11/27/2006 7:05:56 PM PST by Lauren BaRecall (The GOP got killed by the RINOvirus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bd476
What exactly is a "moderate judge?" I thought the job of a judge is to interpret the law blindly as it was written and intended by the legislative branch. To say "moderate" is to say that the judge is using his own philosophical beliefs in enforcing the law. Does a moderate judge enforce part of the Constitution or enforce part of the law?

I guess Specter wants judges sometimes to interpret the law and sometimes to write the law. With that attitude, we could just tell the members of Congress to go home because they are redundant.

72 posted on 11/27/2006 7:10:21 PM PST by adam_smith_76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bd476

Well, when the decision to let Specter be chairman was being debated, I argued strongly against it, warning that when Bush became a lame duck Specter would probably break loose and do what he wanted.

Other Freepers argued that Bush had a hammerlock on Specter, but I wasn't so sure.

Now we've reached that point. We'll see. If Specter makes liberal noises and Bush approves, then it's Bush's fault. If Specter goes off in his own direction and refuses to take any direction from Bush, then it's Specter's fault.

But it must be admitted it would also be Bush's fault, since he's the one who put Specter in this position. Yet I'm willing to wait and see what happens, nonetheless. It's what politicians do in the crunch that counts. I don't care what Specter says, as long as he remains a team player and does the right thing.


73 posted on 11/27/2006 7:18:07 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew

You are right...and I voted for this president twice...But now I realize he doesn't have the stomach for a real fight...he has lost the congress, and he will now try to accomodate the Demoncrats...

I am a life-long conservative who cannot stand the thought that even though the majority believes in conservative principles, we put hacks in office who just don't get it...and Specter is among the worst...

But BUSH knew what he was, and STILL supported his getting the chairmanship of that committee...

HOW MUCH MORE NAIVE (HATE TO SAY STUPID) BEHAVIOR CAN BUSH PERFORM???


74 posted on 11/27/2006 9:31:02 PM PST by Chuck_101 (NO REMF... then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Lauren BaRecall

I agree. That is a very contented cat.


75 posted on 11/27/2006 10:06:32 PM PST by Slings and Arrows ("Sunni or later Shi'ite happens." --spokeshave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: adam_smith_76
What exactly is a "moderate judge?"

'Moderate' judge is a code word for 'Pro-abortion' judge.

76 posted on 11/27/2006 11:46:31 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth? (Gal.4:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: BW2221; Dane
Aren't you gonna blame Tom Cancredo for this? You love to blame him for everything. Yeah, it's all Tom's fault.

Why are you baiting Dane?

He made a valid point.

Bush has ignored Specters 'advise' and continued to put up conservative judges.

Lets see how 'pro-life' those Democrats who were elected as pro-life, really are.

77 posted on 11/27/2006 11:49:59 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth? (Gal.4:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
the President can play that game too. No legislation signed period, until the judicial nominations move forward.

I think if it goes unsigned for so many days, it automatically becomes Law. Blackbird.

78 posted on 11/28/2006 5:12:27 AM PST by BlackbirdSST (Stay out of the Bushes, unless you're RINO hunting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST
I think if it goes unsigned for so many days, it automatically becomes Law. Blackbird.

Not if it's vetoed.

79 posted on 11/28/2006 7:31:06 AM PST by ElkGroveDan ( What does it profit a man to gain the whole world but lose his own soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: bd476

Specter is paroting the words of his left wing staffers.


80 posted on 11/28/2006 7:38:46 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson