Fusion At The Cores Of Planets And The Origin Of Earth's Oceans
Abstract:
The text proposes that neutrino oscillations inside planetary matter are responsible for the fabrication of new protons, neutrons and electrons. From this, hydrogen nuclei are likely to form at the core of dense rocky planets. Slow neutrons produced from the oscillation of neutrinos inside dense matter, may be fused into atoms near a planet's core. This will result in new elements production within a planet. Calculation of how many neutrino oscillations are required for new matter fabrication inside a planet is discussed. A plausible fusion process with growth of heavier elements is described via slow neutron amalgamation with atoms and standard beta decay processes which are commonly utilized in production of heavier elements in a laboratory context. Newly fabricated hydrogen is slowly brought to the surface, transiting crustal rocks and into the hydrosphere and atmosphere. A new proposal for the origin of Earth's oceans is discussed. Seven predictions are proposed which are a direct consequence of this physical geochemical model. This model illustrates that a Big Bang creation event is not required to account for observed Geo and Cosmo-chemical abundance i.e., the fabrication of hydrogen. See also my related planetary expansion paper under "Planetary Sciences" on the index page or by clicking here: http://www.johnkharms.com/planetary.htm . Also see "Solar System and Galaxy Evolution" at: http://www.johnkharms.com/solarsystem.htm .
Key Words: Neutrinos, Neutrino Oscillations, Chemistry, Big Bang, Protons, Neutrons, Electrons, Matter Fabrication, Slow Neutrons, Fusion, Ocean Water, Metallic Hydrogen
Cool, got to watch out for those neutrons, 'specially the slow ones.
Interesting description of the formation of planets like Earth, bookmark'd the link
Thanks E.
oh, and...
Small Comets and Our Origins
University of Iowa | circa 1999 | Louis A. Frank
Posted on 10/20/2004 2:13:25 AM EDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1250694/posts
Ridiculous. Neutrinos can't form baryons spontaneously; it violates several conservation laws. But even if we assume they can, they can't do it unless their energies are greater than 1 GeV (the mass of the neutron) in principle, but in practice the energy would have to be much greater than that, because it has to be above 1 GeV in the rest frame of the collision, not in the Earth's frame. But that last point I also waive.
The fact of the matter is that the flux of neutrinos with energies greater than 1 GeV is vanishingly small. That excludes any neutrinos from any star or supernova, or even relics from the Big Bang. All that is left are a fraction of the neutrinos from Active Galactic Nuclei. Think about how little light the Earth receives from AGNs, and you'll have a rough idea of how few neutrinos that comprises.
But how much energy would we need? Well, these...individuals...are claiming that MOST of the mass of the Earth came from this process, so let's suppose that all of it was created this way. Since the neutrinos aren't enough, let's suppose that every erg the Earth receives from the Sun gets converted to energy.
The Earth has a mass of 6x1024 Kg. That translates to 5.4x1041 Joules of energy.
The Earth receives 2x1017 Watts from the sun. A Watt is one Joule per second.
That would take 2.7x1024 seconds.
There are 3x107 seconds in a year.
Therefore, it would take 9x1016 years to build an Earth this way. The universe is 1.4x1010 years old. So it would take six million universe lifetimes to build up the Earth in this way, but that's if you use the total output of the sun. (Or rather, a series of ones like it. A star like that only lasts 10 billion years.) If you're depending on high-energy neutrinos, it will take gigantically longer.