Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

War Of The Pyramid Theorists
Jerusalem Post ^ | 4-1-2007 | Yaniv Salama-Scheer - Jorg Luyken

Posted on 04/02/2007 4:37:58 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
Doh!

21 posted on 04/02/2007 11:21:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Monday, April 2, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...
Thanks Blam.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

22 posted on 04/02/2007 11:21:59 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Monday, April 2, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

A few years ago, some French “scientist” claimed the pyramids were made of cement! The most recent theory is that they were built from the inside out, whatever that means. Personally, I think the pyramids were built by the Egyptians as part of their religion, and every other theory is an attempt to sell books.


23 posted on 04/02/2007 11:23:52 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Is it a mere coincidence that pyramids are found across our globe? Did cultures ranging across vast spaces in geography and time, such as the ancient Egyptians; early Buddhists; the Maya, Inca, Toltec, and Aztec civilizations of the Americas; the Celts of the British Isles; and even the Mississippi Indians of pre-Columbian Illinois, simply dream the same dreams and envision the same structures?

Yep.. That's about it..

The pyramid is the first logical application of multi-story architecture..
Why? Because it is the most stable..
Additionally, the basic Step-Pyramid is highly defensible..

The step-pyramid, ziggurat, and classic pyramid are all very logically the first type of major building to be attempted, regardless of what culture or part of the world one may be in.
There is no need for some sort of mystic egyptian knowledge about pyramids to be spread around the world..
Any culture that figures out how to stack two stone blocks atop one another to build a wall will eventually come the stepped pyramid at the very least..

24 posted on 04/02/2007 11:45:25 PM PDT by Drammach ("If you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." -- Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam; SunkenCiv
An intriguing theory (at least one that is well presented).

http://khufu.3ds.com/introduction/

25 posted on 04/02/2007 11:51:43 PM PDT by uglybiker (AU-TO-MO-BEEEEEEEL?!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoforBroke

http://www.specialtyinterests.net/hyksos.html

Chronologically Helpful Parallels between the Hyksos and the Amalekites


26 posted on 04/02/2007 11:53:00 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum Aussie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam


What is this nonsense? Egyptians built these pyramids!!
27 posted on 04/02/2007 11:58:49 PM PDT by Pro-Bush (hater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

“It’s apropo”

http://www.abc.net.au/tv/differenceofopinion/

View Transcript.


28 posted on 04/03/2007 12:26:07 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum Aussie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Are you referring to those XIV dynasty pharaohs with Semitic names, like Yakobaam (Jacob), Ishpi (Joseph), and Khendjer (pig, what a name!)?


29 posted on 04/03/2007 2:53:41 AM PDT by Berosus ("There is no beauty like Jerusalem, no wealth like Rome, no depravity like Arabia."--the Talmud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I sat down the other night to watch what appeared to be a good program on the pyramids.

Inside of 10 minutes, the announcer went off on a rant something like this; “And then, ~suddenly!~, there appeared in the midst of the deserts of Egypt, giant pyramidal structures which existent technology could never have built”.

A couple of minutes later ALIENS were mentioned and away it went.

[and I turned it off]

30 posted on 04/03/2007 5:27:19 AM PDT by Salamander (And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Depend which time scale you believe. Personally I have no opinion since i’ve heard several equally convincing arguments for several different pharohs. After all, we still can’t prove exactly what or how many the migration comprised or if it happened at all...we are still scratching in the dust.


31 posted on 04/03/2007 6:07:48 AM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
Personally, I think the pyramids were built by the Egyptians as part of their religion, and every other theory is an attempt to sell books.

Both. A - it was good for their religion but B, they invented papyrus and were able to get in to the publishing industry on the ground floor, hence their interest in building anything which could allow ranters like von Daniken and Hancock to publish their tripe. It's all a conspiracy, I tell you!

32 posted on 04/03/2007 6:10:55 AM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blam

a picture of your dad? Just how old ARE you? LOL


33 posted on 04/03/2007 6:14:36 AM PDT by MacDorcha (In Theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Androcles
"Both. A - it was good for their religion but B, they invented papyrus and were able to get in to the publishing industry on the ground floor..."

The oldest paper ever found was with the Caucasian mummies found in the area of Urumchi, China. It had the extinct Indo-European language Tocharian A written on it.

34 posted on 04/03/2007 6:44:27 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Drammach

Ockham’s Razor...............


35 posted on 04/03/2007 6:52:47 AM PDT by lmailbvmbipfwedu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blam

Interesting - got a good link to a site - I’d like to read up on it. I’m sure it is in the GGG list but that’s kind of huge...


36 posted on 04/03/2007 7:01:25 AM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lmailbvmbipfwedu
Ockham’s Razor...............

It's a safety razor with everybody using the shielded edge. Everybody! Nobody ever gets it right anymore.

37 posted on 04/03/2007 8:10:17 AM PDT by RightWhale (3 May '07 3:14 PM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Androcles

True, but there isn’t any Amarna-period record of an egress of Israelites; the usual error is to equate a phrase “apiru” (”bandits”) to “Hebrews” and claim that during Akhenaten’s time the Conquest of Joshua was taking place. :’)

Joseph entered Egypt during the Middle Kingdom — the Egyptian mentioned by name in his story in Genesis occurs just once in surviving Egyptian records, and that is in the Middle Kingdom. During the New Kingdom, Hatshepsut went to Punt, and left a relief of the trip, including the name of the guy who met her when she came off the boat, and that name is the same as a port official in the time of Solomon.

Ramses II’s canopic jars were recently examined, and there’s a duck and cover going on right now simply because the contents of the jars turned out to be more than 700 years younger than the conventional pseudochronology requires. Eventually cosmic ray exposure dating will be done on the monuments of Abu Simbel, they will be found to be similarly too young, and there will be more duck and cover.

It is true that Ramses II had his own name and image carved over existing work — there’s a monumental head I saw in an exhibit, and it had been made as a representation of a Middle Kingdom pharaoh, but Ramses had it altered into his own— and while I doubt that Abu Simbel was made earlier, I suppose that’s possible. Ramses II had his own cartouche carved over the cartouche of Tutankhamen in the colomnade at Luxor, but near the top of at least one of the pillars, the workers either missed one, or figured no one could see it from the ground anyway.


38 posted on 04/03/2007 9:11:03 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Monday, April 2, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: blam

Some of these theories are a pain in my Hawass


39 posted on 04/03/2007 9:12:58 AM PDT by Sam Ketcham (Amnesty means vote dilution, & increased taxes to bring us down to the world poverty level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Hold it. Are you saying that extraterrestrials *didn’t* make the Pyramids?!? Oh, god, my head is spinning, I think I’m gonna pass out, oh, what a world, what a world, nothing makes sense anymore... [clunk!]


40 posted on 04/03/2007 9:13:53 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Monday, April 2, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson