Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GourmetDan
Well, here we have evidence that either protein decay rates projected back into time are grossly wrong *or* time projections are grossly wrong. Take your pick.

Proteins don't have "decay rates." Proteins decay, but they do so unevenly depending on the environment. The human proteins in Egyptian mummies, for example, clearly outlast human proteins in other environments.

Clearly this study shows that in certain circumstances, proteins can be preserved for an exceedingly long period of time.

23 posted on 04/12/2007 3:10:56 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Alter Kaker
"Clearly this study shows that in certain circumstances, proteins can be preserved for an exceedingly long period of time."

The only thing this clearly shows is that you *assume* that 'in certain circumstances, proteins can be preserved for an exceedingly long period of time'.

For without the assumption of 68 MM year age, the notability collapses.

27 posted on 04/12/2007 3:17:11 PM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson